The strictfp metadata was added to the casting AST nodes in D85960, but we aren't using that metadata yet. This patch adds that support.
In order to avoid lots of ad-hoc passing around of the strictfp bits I updated the IRBuilder when moving from a function that has the Expr* to a function that lacks it. I believe we should switch to this pattern to keep the strictfp support from being overly invasive.
For the purpose of testing that we're picking up the right metadata, I also made my tests use a pragma to make the AST's strictfp metadata not match the global strictfp metadata. This exposes issues that we need to deal with in subsequent patches, and I believe this is the right method for most all of our clang strictfp tests.
Is it possible to merge this variables into OldFPFeatures? In what cases state of Builder may differ from the state of CGF.CurFPFeatures?