Ensure that we provide a Module when checking if a rename of an intrinsic is necessary.
This fixes the issue that was detected by https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=32288
(as mentioned by @fhahn), after committing D91250.
Note that the LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName is being deprecated in favor of LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName2.
Not sure about the name, but I think Eric's suggestion of LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedNameWithModule on the list seems a bit more descriptive to me. Not sure what others think and naming is hard.