- The generated file contained a lot of duplicate switch cases, e.g.:
switch (Syntax) {
case AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax::AS_GNU:
return llvm::StringSwitch<int>(Name)
...
.Case("error", 1)
.Case("warning", 1)
.Case("error", 1)
.Case("warning", 1)- Some attributes were listed in wrong places, e.g.:
case AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax::AS_CXX11: {
if (ScopeName == "") {
return llvm::StringSwitch<int>(Name)
...
.Case("warn_unused_result", LangOpts.CPlusPlus11 ? 201907 : 0)warn_unused_result is a non-standard attribute and should not be
available as [[warn_unused_result]].
- Some attributes had the wrong version, e.g.:
case AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax::AS_CXX11: {
} else if (ScopeName == "gnu") {
return llvm::StringSwitch<int>(Name)
...
.Case("fallthrough", LangOpts.CPlusPlus11 ? 201603 : 0)[[gnu::fallthrough]] is a non-standard spelling and should not have the
standard version. Instead, __has_cpp_attribute should return 1 for it.
There is another issue with attributes that share spellings, e.g.:
.Case("interrupt", true && (T.getArch() == llvm::Triple::arm || ...) ? 1 : 0)
.Case("interrupt", true && (T.getArch() == llvm::Triple::avr) ? 1 : 0)
...
.Case("interrupt", true && (T.getArch() == llvm::Triple::riscv32 || ...) ? 1 : 0)As can be seen, __has_attribute(interrupt) would only return true for
ARM targets. This patch does not address this issue.
For the context, the attribute is defined with the following spellings:
let Spellings = [CXX11<"", "nodiscard", 201907>, C23<"", "nodiscard", 202003>, CXX11<"clang", "warn_unused_result">, GCC<"warn_unused_result">];