The current naming is asymmetric to naming of vp.trunc (VP_TRUNCATE).
It may also become easily mistaken when we have vp.round in the future.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
craig.topper reames rogfer01 jacquesguan
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
The name was chosen to be consistent with ISD::FP_ROUND. There is no ISD::FP_TRUNCATE. The naming issue you mention already exists for ISD::FP_ROUND and ISD::FROUND. Consistency with non-VP opcodes is more important.