The reason for generating mv a0, a0 instruction is when the stack object offset is large then int<12>. To deal this situation, in the elimintateFrameIndex function, it will
create a virtual register, which needs the register scavenger to scavenge it. If the machine instruction that contains the stack object and the opcode is ADDI(the addi
was generated by frameindexNode), and then this instruction's destination register was the same as the register that was generated by the register scavenger, then the
mv a0, a0 was generated. So to eliminnate this instruction, in the eliminateFrameIndex function, if the instrution opcode is ADDI, then the virtual register can't be created
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
This is a bit ugly. Surely a simple peephole optimisation should be able to fix this and any other cases more generally? But also please give this a better title and commit message.
It's also wrong if the ADDI has FrameReg as its destination. A neater approach might be to always use the destination register (if there is one, using general instruction query information) as the destination for the ADD, keeping the scratch register for the movImm call. Then you'd only need special logic to work out whether you need to keep the (modified) existing instruction.
I agree that it is wrong if the ADDI has FrameReg as its destination. And I adapted your suggestion.
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
179 | Just curios, does it possible get any other opcode than ADDI? below code are just update Offset, I guess that means we already assume it must be ADDI here? But I could be wrong since I didn't seriously tracing here before. If my assumption is right then the code could be further simplified? |
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
179 | The ADDI is generated when the frameindexSDNode be selected to ADDI case ISD::FrameIndex: { SDValue Imm = CurDAG->getTargetConstant(0, DL, XLenVT); int FI = cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(Node)->getIndex(); SDValue TFI = CurDAG->getTargetFrameIndex(FI, VT); ReplaceNode(Node, CurDAG->getMachineNode(RISCV::ADDI, DL, VT, TFI, Imm)); return; } In the eliminateFrameIndex function, I think the instructions that contains the frameindex operand are |
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
179 | If we had reg+reg addressing then we could fold the add into loads/stores, but given we don't I think this is the only case. |
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
179 | Do you talk about what RISCVDAGToDAGISel::doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI function do ? |
clang-tidy: warning: invalid case style for variable 'isADDI' [readability-identifier-naming]
not useful