To be consistent with RISC-V branding guidelines
https://riscv.org/about/risc-v-branding-guidelines/
Think we should be using RISC-V where possible.
D146449 already updated comments. Strings may have more user impact.
Differential D146451
[RISCV] Replace RISCV->RISC-V in strings. craig.topper on Mar 20 2023, 12:35 PM. Authored by
Details To be consistent with RISC-V branding guidelines D146449 already updated comments. Strings may have more user impact.
Diff Detail
Event TimelineComment Actions The logic I saw with the pass names is that the backend for the RISC-V architecture is called "RISCV". But I've got no objection to changing. Comment Actions Not as compelling as user facing strings or comments that clearly refer to the RISC-V ISA rather than the "RISCV" LLVM backend. But I don't really see a good reason not to be consistent. LGTM. |