As of this commit in the riscv-isa-manual, Zfa is at version 0.2. Reviewing the commit history for zfa.tex there are no relevant changes since 0.1. As such, we can simply increment the version number.
This change also removes the claim in RISCVUsage that we implement a "subset of" Zfa, as I believe this is no longer true. That sentence previously incorrectly claimed we didn't implement fli.{h,s,d} (I corrected this a couple of weeks ago) but I think should have removed the "subset of" wording too.
Zfa wasn't in 16 right? So it looks like we failed to mention adding Zfa here when it was added. Can we have something like "Added support for Zfa extension version 0.2" instead?