To simplify more code.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
One concern: is it possible to be false positive for these usages (though I haven't found any failed test)? When mapping pseudos to MC opcode, we may lost some information like MASK, TIED, TU/TA, etc.
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
2145 | For example, we didn't catch _MASK here. |
Comment Actions
I am concerned about that. The operand numbers are different between the different versions. And they have different properties.
Can we change uint16_t to unsigned?