Depends on D153345
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
bolt/test/RISCV/internal-func-reloc.s | ||
---|---|---|
13 | This is something we might want to ask of binaries that intend to be BOLTed, as BOLT is going to do a lot of things that RISCV is attempting to do with linkers and linker relaxation. This is specially true if BOLT later reorders functions in a way that now requires thunks/stubs insertion to extend the range of branches that got prematurely relaxed by the linker. |
bolt/test/RISCV/internal-func-reloc.s | ||
---|---|---|
13 | My hope is that this won't be necessary, as it goes against the idea of BOLT working on production binaries where linker relaxation will most certainly be enabled for RISC-V. I have a WIP patch that tries to deal with this (in a nutshell: "unrelax" instructions in BOLT and let JITLink relax them again later, if possible) that I hope to be able to post later this week. |
This is something we might want to ask of binaries that intend to be BOLTed, as BOLT is going to do a lot of things that RISCV is attempting to do with linkers and linker relaxation. This is specially true if BOLT later reorders functions in a way that now requires thunks/stubs insertion to extend the range of branches that got prematurely relaxed by the linker.