Replace getAs with castAs and add assert if needed.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
887 | The assert that looks like assert(x && "x should not be null") seems strange. Failed assert(x) implies that x should not be null. If there is a message, a message saying what is wrong and why is much more useful. | |
clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprObjC.cpp | ||
2441 | That seems to be a strange place before and after changes. With or without change, when ReceiverType.isNull() is true we just end up passing nullptr as receiverTypeInfo to the BuildClassMessage which doesn't seem to be checking its non-nullness before dereferencing it, even though its description says that receiverTypeInfo can be null. |
clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
887 | Would you suggest removing the message and changing it to assert(DeepestParsedCaseStmt); I am not sure what message would be useful here. | |
clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprObjC.cpp | ||
2441 | I see your point about passing ReceiverTypeInfo as nullptr to BuildClassMessage method - it seems ok to do that. |
clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
886–889 | The assert doesn't add much value, this seems to be a false positive in the analysis. If we have no top-level case statement yet, then we get into the if branch on line 884, but that then sets DeepestParsedCaseStmt on line 890, and that must be non-null because we verified that Case is valid above on line 876. So by the time we get into the else branch, DeepestParsedCaseStmt must be nonnull. I don't think changes are needed here at all; WDYT? | |
clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprObjC.cpp | ||
2441 | I think there's a different assertion needed here. The invariant that BuildClassMessage() has is that the first argument (the TypeSourceInfo * needs to be nonnull if the third argument (the SourceLocation) is invalid. So I think this assert should be: assert(((isSuperReceiver && Loc.isValid()) || receiverTypeInfo) && "Either the super receiver location needs to be valid or the receiver needs valid type source information"); | |
clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp | ||
2711–2712 | Slightly better fix so we don't do "isa" followed by "cast". |
Changes to address comments.
clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
886–889 | This makes sense. I didn't thoroughly consider the Case.isInvalid() check above in my analysis. Thank you for catching this! I removed this change. |
Thank you @aaron.ballman and @Fznamznon for reviewing! I landed this patch with commit d2fafa79ef08f9ef9cd0108a6caa7fc61a31bdeb
The assert that looks like assert(x && "x should not be null") seems strange. Failed assert(x) implies that x should not be null. If there is a message, a message saying what is wrong and why is much more useful.