As reported in pr51656 scev-based salvaging can use excessive resources to the point of crashing when large SCEV expressions are encountered. This patch places a limit on the length of expression for which an attempt to translate will be made.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Looks like this didn't actually apply, the revision is showing this update as having applied no changes and the formatting issues are still present.
I also suppose it would be good if we could have the expression limit put as a variable with an explanatory comment, rather than a magic number. Other than that, this change LGTM.
Could the 64 be moved to a variable? Something similar to MaxIVUsers in the same file would be ideal - a static const variable at the top of the file with a comment explaining what it is used for.
Just a few nits inline. I otherwise defer to @StephenTozer's reviewing.
llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/pr51656.ll | ||
---|---|---|
3 | Is there a reason for this test to be X86 specific? | |
79 | nit: I think the convention is to use a single ; for FileCheck directive comments. |
Two nits, other than that LGTM.
llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
142 | ||
llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/pr51656.ll | ||
78 | Just for the sake of resiliency, it would be better to replace the metadata references here with variable matches. So essentially replace !20 with ![[VAR_E:[0-9]+]], and then insert another check directive ![[VAR_E]] = !DILocalVariable(name: "e" below. |