- User Since
- Mar 2 2013, 8:12 AM (358 w, 6 d)
Very cool. I think we can improve the code quite a bit while we're here.
Thu, Jan 16
Any other comments?
My understanding is that DW_OP_piece is still incomplete, right?
LGTM with Vedant's testcase!
Wed, Jan 15
This five patches reduces 'total availability' metric of clang binary (debug build) from 126% to 87%.
Tue, Jan 14
- removed copyied&pasted sysroot member from DwarfDebug
- address feedback in MetadataLoader
Addressed feedback from @dblaikie :
- sysroot is now an LLDB tuning setting
- attribute moved from skeleton to .dwo unit
But removing the default values is also seems to be out of the scope of the patch.
Mon, Jan 13
Fri, Jan 10
Thu, Jan 9
Some mysterious CFI failures I haven't looked into yet, but were pretty clearly blamed on this change & went away with a revert.
@dblaikie: I just saw you reverted https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc51b45e32ef7f35c11891f60871aa9c2c04cd991 ? What happened?
Removed workaround for the bug @dbalikie fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc51b45e32ef7f35c11891f60871aa9c2c04cd991
Ping @debug-info / @dblaikie for a review.
Should we merge this like that, or is there a better way of doing this?
I believe that all of these make sense.
What about debuginfo-tests/llvm-prettyprinters/gdb/ and then we'll create an lldb subdirectory next to later?
Wed, Jan 8
Do we currently have a way to end up in this state?
This is cute. We should do something similar with the LLDB pretty printers.
Address feedback from Raphael.
How ubiquitous is matplotlib? I wonder if it might be better to textually print out a gnuplot file or something similar. OTOH the surface area in the code seems to be really small, so this may be fine.
Fri, Dec 20
Does the mean these mappings will show up in the settings command?
Thu, Dec 19
Forgot to include the LLDB patch.