This patch implements the vec_expandm function prototypes in altivec.h in order to utilize
the vector expand with mask instructions introduced in Power10.
Depends on D82675.
Paths
| Differential D82727
[PowerPC] Implement Vector Expand Mask builtins in LLVM/Clang ClosedPublic Authored by amyk on Jun 28 2020, 12:39 PM.
Details
Summary This patch implements the vec_expandm function prototypes in altivec.h in order to utilize Depends on D82675.
Diff Detail
Event TimelineHerald added subscribers: shchenz, hiraditya, nemanjai. · View Herald TranscriptJun 28 2020, 12:39 PM amyk retitled this revision from [PowerPC][Power10] Implement Vector Expand Mask builtins in LLVM/Clang to [PowerPC] Implement Vector Expand Mask builtins in LLVM/Clang.Jul 27 2020, 4:00 PM
Comment Actions Overall LGTM. I only have some comments on the nits.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 3 2020, 10:38 AM This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds.Sep 6 2020, 3:13 PM Closed by commit rGefa57f9a7adb: [PowerPC] Implement Vector Expand Mask builtins in LLVM/Clang (authored by amyk). · Explain Why This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments.
Revision Contents
Diff 290152 clang/include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsPPC.def
clang/lib/Headers/altivec.h
clang/test/CodeGen/builtins-ppc-p10vector.c
llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsPowerPC.td
llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrPrefix.td
llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/p10-vector-mask-ops.ll
|
nit: can we change the naming convention to be consistent as above? (e.g. "test_vec_expandm_uc")
I do not have a strong preference for either way since we did have different naming conventions in builtins-ppc-p10vector.c and p10-vector-mask-ops.ll for the vector extract cases.