Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
LGTM, with the following additions:
- Add one test with volatile load
- Add one test with volatile store
- Add one test with atomic load or store
Comment Actions
Just to double check, it should be ok to perform scalarization on volatile/atomic stores right? That's what D150717 already does
Comment Actions
I was only able to add the volatile tests, since there atomic loads/stores don't seem to be permitted for vector types
Comment Actions
Generally, no. If this is triggering for volatile memory ops, we should probably disable it. There's no profit to be had here, and only risk.