[Analysis]Add getPointersDiff function to improve compile time.

[ABataev]

Summary

Added getPointersDiff function to LoopAccessAnalysis and used it instead
direct calculatoin of the distance between pointers and/or
isConsecutiveAccess function in SLP vectorizer to improve compile time
and detection of stores consecutive chains.

Part of D57059

[ABataev]

llvm/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/pr35497.ll

2–5

No need for the second run of SLPVectorizer pass after this change

[lebedev.ri]

Seems about right, some thoughts.

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1129–1134

1158–1159

1161–1165

Why not just do this in APInt directly?

1167–1172

But this checks that OffsetDelta is a multiple of original pointed-to type,
not what the comment says?

I suppose this overly restrictive.

1180–1185

Would it be better to add the non-constant case as an else to if (PtrA1 == PtrB1) {,
and deduplicate this code?

[ABataev]

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1129–1134

Ok, will do

1158–1159

It is used for Size

1161–1165

Will try

1167–1172

1. Yes, the comment is wrong, will fix it.
2. Unfortunately not. Caused by a real example.

1180–1185

I'll try

[lebedev.ri]

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1132–1133

Feel free to ignore this one:
for opaque ptr types forward-compatibility, it might be good to just take element type as an extra argument
and not look at the elt types of the pointers.

1158–1159

Err, i should have left this as a comment.
I think this should mention that while we might have traversed into another address space,
we still want to keep the original index width.
Either that, or we need to refresh index width.

1167–1172

Err, i understand what this checks and that this is for sure currently needed in some cases,
i'm only saying that perhaps some code could deal with sub-element-misalignment.

[ABataev]

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1158–1159

Ah, I see, thanks.

1167–1172

I can add a boolean param to the function to control this check

[spatel]

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1137–1138

Drive-by comment: should this be the first thing we check? Is it valid for callers to pass in null values for one or both of these arguments, or can we assert that it should not happen?

[ABataev]

Address comments, rebase, improvements

[lebedev.ri]

Can isConsecutiveAccess() be reimplemented in terms of getPointersDiff() now?
LGTM, but someone else should take a look, too.
Nice, https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=bde995c9c2a0f73c69f1ca60b94bec0bebf20537&to=de67ba4218b6a64361e0269624a6998acb493b51&stat=instructions

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1206

Why is this no longer llvm::SmallSet<>?

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp

945–946

This looks like a separate change.

[ABataev]

In D98967#2643717, @lebedev.ri wrote:

Can isConsecutiveAccess() be reimplemented in terms of getPointersDiff() now?

Sure, I'll rework isConsecutiveAccess() to use getPointersDiff()

LGTM, but someone else should take a look, too.
Nice, https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=bde995c9c2a0f73c69f1ca60b94bec0bebf20537&to=de67ba4218b6a64361e0269624a6998acb493b51&stat=instructions

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1206

Well, I thought that it is going to be more optimal to use std::set here directly. For SmallSet we cannot pass comparer directly (but this can be fixed, I think), for the small number of elements it uses SmallVector with linear search and if growth too big it switches to std::set, copying all the elements from the SmallVector. I think that here we can use std::set directly to avoid extra copying in case of the increasing number of elements and linear search for the small number of elements.

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp

945–946

Well, in general, yes but this also improves compile time as we do not need to get pointers diff in this case and we can return ScoreFail immediately.

[ABataev]

Rebase + rework of isConsecutiveAccess()

[RKSimon]

LGTM - still OK with this @lebedev.ri ?

[lebedev.ri]

In D98967#2645531, @RKSimon wrote:

LGTM - still OK with this @lebedev.ri ?

Yep

[RKSimon]

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1230

@ABataev IsConsecutive is false so isn't this line redundant?

Noticed by static analysis.

[ABataev]

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

1230

Yes, just forgot to remove this line after rework. Will do thisnlater today.

[uabelho]

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp

3155

Hi,
I'm seeing a miscompile with this patch for my out-of-tree target and I wonder if we perhaps should pass StrictCheck=true for this getPointerDiff call.

In the case I see I have two loads where Dist is calculated as 1, but actually it's 3/2, and the resulting vectorized load then doesn't load the correct words.

I'm having some troubles reproducing this on an in-tree target but I don't see why it shouldn't be possible.

I see that if I do pass StrictCheck=true here the miscopile goes away.

@ABataev , what do you think about this? Is it possible that the code broke here?

[ABataev]

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp

3155

It should not be broken here. sortPtrAccesses should call getPointersDiff with StrictCheck already after 040c60d9b69e2ad570556f255a746929a4b10e82 from Richard Smith and we can get here only if getPointerDiff with StrictCheck==true returned defined result already. Try to update your repo. Plus, this code is for stores, not for loads. Anyway, your problem should be fixed already, just update

[uabelho]

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp

3155

Aha, yep 040c60d9b69e2 seems to help. Great!
(And yes, the problem I saw was with the load case at line 2880 and not here in store.)

[bkramer]

Looks like this can trigger an infinite loop: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49898

[ABataev]

In D98967#2677242, @bkramer wrote:

Looks like this can trigger an infinite loop: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49898

I'll fix it ASAP, thanks for the report and reproducer!

llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h

 /// If necessary this method will version the stride of the pointer according
 /// to \p PtrToStride and therefore add further predicates to \p PSE.
 /// The \p Assume parameter indicates if we are allowed to make additional
 /// run-time assumptions.
 int64_t getPtrStride(PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE, Value *Ptr, const Loop *Lp,
                      const ValueToValueMap &StridesMap = ValueToValueMap(),
                      bool Assume = false, bool ShouldCheckWrap = true);
 
+/// Returns the distance between the pointers \p PtrA and \p PtrB iff they are
+/// compatible and it is possible to calculate the distance between them. This
+/// is a simple API that does not depend on the analysis pass.
+/// \param StrictCheck Ensure that the calculated distance matches the
+/// type-based one after all the bitcasts removal in the provided pointers.
+Optional<int> getPointersDiff(Value *PtrA, Value *PtrB, const DataLayout &DL,
+                              ScalarEvolution &SE, bool StrictCheck = false);
+
 /// Attempt to sort the pointers in \p VL and return the sorted indices
 /// in \p SortedIndices, if reordering is required.
 ///
 /// Returns 'true' if sorting is legal, otherwise returns 'false'.
 ///
 /// For example, for a given \p VL of memory accesses in program order, a[i+4],
 /// a[i+0], a[i+1] and a[i+7], this function will sort the \p VL and save the
 /// sorted indices in \p SortedIndices as a[i+0], a[i+1], a[i+4], a[i+7] and

llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp

if (Assume) {
       PSE.setNoOverflow(Ptr, SCEVWrapPredicate::IncrementNUSW);
     } else
       return 0;
   }
 
   return Stride;
 }
 
+Optional<int> llvm::getPointersDiff(Value *PtrA, Value *PtrB,
+                                    const DataLayout &DL, ScalarEvolution &SE,
+                                    bool StrictCheck) {
+  assert(PtrA && PtrB && "Expected non-nullptr pointers.");
+  // Make sure that A and B are different pointers.
+  if (PtrA == PtrB)
+    return 0;
+
+  // Check that the pointers are valid.
+  if (PtrA->getType() != PtrB->getType())
+    return None;
+
+  unsigned ASA = PtrA->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();
+  unsigned ASB = PtrB->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace();
+
+  // Check that the address spaces match.
+  if (ASA != ASB)
+    return None;
+
+  unsigned IdxWidth = DL.getIndexSizeInBits(ASA);
+  Type *Ty = cast<PointerType>(PtrA->getType())->getElementType();
+
+  APInt OffsetA(IdxWidth, 0), OffsetB(IdxWidth, 0);
+  Value *PtrA1 = PtrA->stripAndAccumulateInBoundsConstantOffsets(DL, OffsetA);
+  Value *PtrB1 = PtrB->stripAndAccumulateInBoundsConstantOffsets(DL, OffsetB);
+
+  IdxWidth = DL.getIndexSizeInBits(ASA);
+  APInt Size(IdxWidth, DL.getTypeStoreSize(Ty));
+  int Val;
+  if (PtrA1 == PtrB1) {
+    // Retrieve the address space again as pointer stripping now tracks through
+    // `addrspacecast`.
+    ASA = cast<PointerType>(PtrA1->getType())->getAddressSpace();
+    ASB = cast<PointerType>(PtrB1->getType())->getAddressSpace();
+    // Check that the address spaces match and that the pointers are valid.
+    if (ASA != ASB)
+      return None;
+
+    IdxWidth = DL.getIndexSizeInBits(ASA);
+    OffsetA = OffsetA.sextOrTrunc(IdxWidth);
+    OffsetB = OffsetB.sextOrTrunc(IdxWidth);
+
+    OffsetB -= OffsetA;
+    Val = OffsetB.getSExtValue();
+  } else {
+    // Otherwise compute the distance with SCEV between the base pointers.
+    const SCEV *PtrSCEVA = SE.getSCEV(PtrA);
+    const SCEV *PtrSCEVB = SE.getSCEV(PtrB);
+    const auto *Diff =
+        dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(SE.getMinusSCEV(PtrSCEVB, PtrSCEVA));
+    if (!Diff)
+      return None;
+    Val = Diff->getAPInt().getSExtValue();
+  }
+  int Sz = Size.getSExtValue();
+
+  int Dist = Val / Sz;
+
+  // Ensure that the calculated distance matches the type-based one after all
+  // the bitcasts removal in the provided pointers.
+  if (!StrictCheck || Dist * Sz == Val)
+    return Dist;
+  return None;
+}
+
 bool llvm::sortPtrAccesses(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, const DataLayout &DL,
                            ScalarEvolution &SE,
                            SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> &SortedIndices) {
   assert(llvm::all_of(
              VL, [](const Value *V) { return V->getType()->isPointerTy(); }) &&
          "Expected list of pointer operands.");
-  SmallVector<std::pair<int64_t, Value *>, 4> OffValPairs;
-  OffValPairs.reserve(VL.size());
-
   // Walk over the pointers, and map each of them to an offset relative to
   // first pointer in the array.
   Value *Ptr0 = VL[0];
-  const SCEV *Scev0 = SE.getSCEV(Ptr0);
-  Value *Obj0 = getUnderlyingObject(Ptr0);
 
-  llvm::SmallSet<int64_t, 4> Offsets;
-  for (auto *Ptr : VL) {
-    // TODO: Outline this code as a special, more time consuming, version of
-    // computeConstantDifference() function.
-    if (Ptr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace() !=
-        Ptr0->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace())
-      return false;
-    // If a pointer refers to a different underlying object, bail - the
-    // pointers are by definition incomparable.
-    Value *CurrObj = getUnderlyingObject(Ptr);
-    if (CurrObj != Obj0)
-      return false;
-
-    const SCEV *Scev = SE.getSCEV(Ptr);
-    const auto *Diff = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(SE.getMinusSCEV(Scev, Scev0));
-    // The pointers may not have a constant offset from each other, or SCEV
-    // may just not be smart enough to figure out they do. Regardless,
-    // there's nothing we can do.
+  using DistOrdPair = std::pair<int64_t, int>;
+  auto Compare = [](const DistOrdPair &L, const DistOrdPair &R) {
+    return L.first < R.first;
+  };
+  std::set<DistOrdPair, decltype(Compare)> Offsets(Compare);
+  Offsets.emplace(0, 0);
+  int Cnt = 1;
+  bool IsConsecutive = true;
+  for (auto *Ptr : VL.drop_front()) {
+    Optional<int> Diff = getPointersDiff(Ptr0, Ptr, DL, SE);
     if (!Diff)
       return false;
 
     // Check if the pointer with the same offset is found.
-    int64_t Offset = Diff->getAPInt().getSExtValue();
-    if (!Offsets.insert(Offset).second)
-      return false;
-    OffValPairs.emplace_back(Offset, Ptr);
+    int64_t Offset = *Diff;
+    auto Res = Offsets.emplace(Offset, Cnt);
+    if (!Res.second)
+      return false;
+    // Consecutive order if the inserted element is the last one.
+    IsConsecutive = IsConsecutive && std::next(Res.first) == Offsets.end();
+    ++Cnt;
   }
   SortedIndices.clear();
+  if (!IsConsecutive) {
+    // Fill SortedIndices array only if it is non-consecutive.
     SortedIndices.resize(VL.size());
-  std::iota(SortedIndices.begin(), SortedIndices.end(), 0);
-
-  // Sort the memory accesses and keep the order of their uses in UseOrder.
-  llvm::stable_sort(SortedIndices, [&](unsigned Left, unsigned Right) {
-    return OffValPairs[Left].first < OffValPairs[Right].first;
-  });
-
-  // Check if the order is consecutive already.
-  if (llvm::all_of(SortedIndices, [&SortedIndices](const unsigned I) {
-        return I == SortedIndices[I];
-      }))
-    SortedIndices.clear();
-
+    Cnt = 0;
+    for (const std::pair<int64_t, int> &Pair : Offsets) {
+      IsConsecutive = IsConsecutive && Cnt == Pair.second;
+      SortedIndices[Cnt] = Pair.second;
+      ++Cnt;
+    }
+  }
   return true;
 }
 
 /// Take the address space operand from the Load/Store instruction.
 /// Returns -1 if this is not a valid Load/Store instruction.
 static unsigned getAddressSpaceOperand(Value *I) {
   if (LoadInst *L = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(I))
     return L->getPointerAddressSpace();

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp

class VLOperands {
     /// The user is internal but in a different lane.
     static const int UserInDiffLaneCost = ExternalUseCost;
 
     /// \returns the score of placing \p V1 and \p V2 in consecutive lanes.
     static int getShallowScore(Value *V1, Value *V2, const DataLayout &DL,
                                ScalarEvolution &SE) {
       auto *LI1 = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(V1);
       auto *LI2 = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(V2);
-      if (LI1 && LI2)
-        return isConsecutiveAccess(LI1, LI2, DL, SE)
-                   ? VLOperands::ScoreConsecutiveLoads
+      if (LI1 && LI2) {
+        if (LI1->getParent() != LI2->getParent())
+          return VLOperands::ScoreFail;
+
+        Optional<int> Dist =
+            getPointersDiff(LI1->getPointerOperand(), LI2->getPointerOperand(),
+                            DL, SE, /*StrictCheck=*/true);
+        return (Dist && *Dist == 1) ? VLOperands::ScoreConsecutiveLoads
                                     : VLOperands::ScoreFail;
+      }
 
       auto *C1 = dyn_cast<Constant>(V1);
       auto *C2 = dyn_cast<Constant>(V2);
       if (C1 && C2)
         return VLOperands::ScoreConstants;
 
       // Extracts from consecutive indexes of the same vector better score as
       // the extracts could be optimized away.
case Instruction::Load: {
         Value *PtrN;
         if (CurrentOrder.empty()) {
           Ptr0 = PointerOps.front();
           PtrN = PointerOps.back();
         } else {
           Ptr0 = PointerOps[CurrentOrder.front()];
           PtrN = PointerOps[CurrentOrder.back()];
         }
-        const SCEV *Scev0 = SE->getSCEV(Ptr0);
-        const SCEV *ScevN = SE->getSCEV(PtrN);
-        const auto *Diff =
-            dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(SE->getMinusSCEV(ScevN, Scev0));
-        uint64_t Size = DL->getTypeAllocSize(ScalarTy);
+        Optional<int> Diff = getPointersDiff(Ptr0, PtrN, *DL, *SE);
         // Check that the sorted loads are consecutive.
-        if (Diff && Diff->getAPInt() == (VL.size() - 1) * Size) {
+        if (static_cast<unsigned>(*Diff) == VL.size() - 1) {
           if (CurrentOrder.empty()) {
             // Original loads are consecutive and does not require reordering.
             ++NumOpsWantToKeepOriginalOrder;
             TreeEntry *TE = newTreeEntry(VL, Bundle /*vectorized*/, S,
                                          UserTreeIdx, ReuseShuffleIndicies);
             TE->setOperandsInOrder();
             LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "SLP: added a vector of loads.\n");
           } else {
case Instruction::Store: {
         Value *PtrN;
         if (CurrentOrder.empty()) {
           Ptr0 = PointerOps.front();
           PtrN = PointerOps.back();
         } else {
           Ptr0 = PointerOps[CurrentOrder.front()];
           PtrN = PointerOps[CurrentOrder.back()];
         }
-        const SCEV *Scev0 = SE->getSCEV(Ptr0);
-        const SCEV *ScevN = SE->getSCEV(PtrN);
-        const auto *Diff =
-            dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(SE->getMinusSCEV(ScevN, Scev0));
-        uint64_t Size = DL->getTypeAllocSize(ScalarTy);
+        Optional<int> Dist = getPointersDiff(Ptr0, PtrN, *DL, *SE);
         // Check that the sorted pointer operands are consecutive.
-        if (Diff && Diff->getAPInt() == (VL.size() - 1) * Size) {
+        if (static_cast<unsigned>(*Dist) == VL.size() - 1) {
           if (CurrentOrder.empty()) {
             // Original stores are consecutive and does not require reordering.
             ++NumOpsWantToKeepOriginalOrder;
             TreeEntry *TE = newTreeEntry(VL, Bundle /*vectorized*/, S,
                                          UserTreeIdx, ReuseShuffleIndicies);
             TE->setOperandsInOrder();
             buildTree_rec(Operands, Depth + 1, {TE, 0});
             LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "SLP: added a vector of stores.\n");
bool SLPVectorizerPass::vectorizeStores(ArrayRef<StoreInst *> Stores,
                                         BoUpSLP &R) {
   // We may run into multiple chains that merge into a single chain. We mark the
   // stores that we vectorized so that we don't visit the same store twice.
   BoUpSLP::ValueSet VectorizedStores;
   bool Changed = false;
 
   int E = Stores.size();
   SmallBitVector Tails(E, false);
-  SmallVector<int, 16> ConsecutiveChain(E, E + 1);
   int MaxIter = MaxStoreLookup.getValue();
+  SmallVector<std::pair<int, int>, 16> ConsecutiveChain(
+      E, std::make_pair(E, INT_MAX));
+  SmallVector<SmallBitVector, 4> CheckedPairs(E, SmallBitVector(E, false));
   int IterCnt;
   auto &&FindConsecutiveAccess = [this, &Stores, &Tails, &IterCnt, MaxIter,
+                                  &CheckedPairs,
                                   &ConsecutiveChain](int K, int Idx) {
     if (IterCnt >= MaxIter)
       return true;
+    if (CheckedPairs[Idx].test(K))
+      return ConsecutiveChain[K].second == 1 &&
+             ConsecutiveChain[K].first == Idx;
     ++IterCnt;
-    if (!isConsecutiveAccess(Stores[K], Stores[Idx], *DL, *SE))
+    CheckedPairs[Idx].set(K);
+    CheckedPairs[K].set(Idx);
+    Optional<int> Diff = getPointersDiff(Stores[K]->getPointerOperand(),
+                                         Stores[Idx]->getPointerOperand(), *DL,
+                                         *SE, /*StrictCheck=*/true);
+    if (!Diff || *Diff == 0)
+      return false;
+    int Val = *Diff;
+    if (Val < 0) {
+      if (ConsecutiveChain[Idx].second > -Val) {
+        Tails.set(K);
+        ConsecutiveChain[Idx] = std::make_pair(K, -Val);
+      }
+      return false;
+    }
+    if (ConsecutiveChain[K].second <= Val)
       return false;
 
     Tails.set(Idx);
-    ConsecutiveChain[K] = Idx;
-    return true;
+    ConsecutiveChain[K] = std::make_pair(Idx, Val);
+    return Val == 1;
   };
   // Do a quadratic search on all of the given stores in reverse order and find
   // all of the pairs of stores that follow each other.
   for (int Idx = E - 1; Idx >= 0; --Idx) {
     // If a store has multiple consecutive store candidates, search according
     // to the sequence: Idx-1, Idx+1, Idx-2, Idx+2, ...
     // This is because usually pairing with immediate succeeding or preceding
     // candidate create the best chance to find slp vectorization opportunity.
     const int MaxLookDepth = std::max(E - Idx, Idx + 1);
     IterCnt = 0;
     for (int Offset = 1, F = MaxLookDepth; Offset < F; ++Offset)
       if ((Idx >= Offset && FindConsecutiveAccess(Idx - Offset, Idx)) ||
           (Idx + Offset < E && FindConsecutiveAccess(Idx + Offset, Idx)))
         break;
   }
 
   // For stores that start but don't end a link in the chain:
   for (int Cnt = E; Cnt > 0; --Cnt) {
     int I = Cnt - 1;
-    if (ConsecutiveChain[I] == E + 1 || Tails.test(I))
+    if (ConsecutiveChain[I].first == E || Tails.test(I))
       continue;
     // We found a store instr that starts a chain. Now follow the chain and try
     // to vectorize it.
     BoUpSLP::ValueList Operands;
     // Collect the chain into a list.
-    while (I != E + 1 && !VectorizedStores.count(Stores[I])) {
+    while (I != E && !VectorizedStores.count(Stores[I])) {
       Operands.push_back(Stores[I]);
+      Tails.set(I);
+      if (ConsecutiveChain[I].second != 1) {
+        // Mark the new end in the chain and go back, if required. It might be
+        // required if the original stores comes in reversed order, for example.
+        if (ConsecutiveChain[I].first != E &&
+            Tails.test(ConsecutiveChain[I].first)) {
+          Tails.reset(ConsecutiveChain[I].first);
+          if (Cnt < ConsecutiveChain[I].first + 2)
+            Cnt = ConsecutiveChain[I].first + 2;
+        }
+        break;
+      }
       // Move to the next value in the chain.
-      I = ConsecutiveChain[I];
+      I = ConsecutiveChain[I].first;
     }
 
     unsigned MaxVecRegSize = R.getMaxVecRegSize();
     unsigned EltSize = R.getVectorElementSize(Operands[0]);
     unsigned MaxElts = llvm::PowerOf2Floor(MaxVecRegSize / EltSize);
 
     unsigned MinVF = std::max(2U, R.getMinVecRegSize() / EltSize);
     unsigned MaxVF = std::min(R.getMaximumVF(EltSize, Instruction::Store),

llvm/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/pr35497.ll

 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -slp-vectorizer -slp-vectorizer -mattr=+sse2 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SSE
-; RUN: opt < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -slp-vectorizer -slp-vectorizer -mattr=+avx  -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=AVX
-; RUN: opt < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -slp-vectorizer -slp-vectorizer -mattr=+avx2 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=AVX
+; RUN: opt < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -slp-vectorizer -mattr=+sse2 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SSE
+; RUN: opt < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -slp-vectorizer -mattr=+avx  -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=AVX
+; RUN: opt < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -slp-vectorizer -mattr=+avx2 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=AVX
 
 %class.1 = type { %class.2 }
 %class.2 = type { %"class.3" }
 %"class.3" = type { %"struct.1", i64 }
 %"struct.1" = type { [8 x i64] }
 
 $_ZN1C10SwitchModeEv = comdat any
 
 ; Function Attrs: uwtable

 ; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP5:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x i64> [[TMP4]], i32 1
 ; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP6:%.*]] = insertelement <2 x i64> poison, i64 [[TMP5]], i32 0
 ; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP7:%.*]] = insertelement <2 x i64> [[TMP6]], i64 [[ADD]], i32 1
 ; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP8:%.*]] = shl <2 x i64> [[TMP7]], <i64 2, i64 2>
 ; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP9:%.*]] = and <2 x i64> [[TMP8]], <i64 20, i64 20>
 ; AVX-NEXT:    [[ARRAYIDX2_6:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [0 x i64], [0 x i64]* undef, i64 0, i64 0
 ; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP10:%.*]] = bitcast i64* [[ARRAYIDX2_6]] to <2 x i64>*
 ; AVX-NEXT:    store <2 x i64> [[TMP4]], <2 x i64>* [[TMP10]], align 1
-; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP11:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x i64> [[TMP4]], i32 0
-; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP12:%.*]] = insertelement <2 x i64> poison, i64 [[TMP11]], i32 0
-; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP13:%.*]] = insertelement <2 x i64> [[TMP12]], i64 [[TMP5]], i32 1
-; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP14:%.*]] = lshr <2 x i64> [[TMP13]], <i64 6, i64 6>
-; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP15:%.*]] = add nuw nsw <2 x i64> [[TMP9]], [[TMP14]]
-; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP16:%.*]] = bitcast i64* [[ARRAYIDX2_2]] to <2 x i64>*
-; AVX-NEXT:    store <2 x i64> [[TMP15]], <2 x i64>* [[TMP16]], align 1
+; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP11:%.*]] = lshr <2 x i64> [[TMP4]], <i64 6, i64 6>
+; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP12:%.*]] = add nuw nsw <2 x i64> [[TMP9]], [[TMP11]]
+; AVX-NEXT:    [[TMP13:%.*]] = bitcast i64* [[ARRAYIDX2_2]] to <2 x i64>*
+; AVX-NEXT:    store <2 x i64> [[TMP12]], <2 x i64>* [[TMP13]], align 1
 ; AVX-NEXT:    ret void
 ;
 entry:
   %0 = load i64, i64* undef, align 1
   %and = shl i64 %0, 2
   %shl = and i64 %and, 20
   %add = add i64 undef, undef
   store i64 %add, i64* undef, align 1