Also add WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN before including windows.h, for consistency with other sources.
Details
- Reviewers
pcc rnk amccarth curdeius zoecarver Mordante ldionne • Quuxplusone - Group Reviewers
Restricted Project - Commits
- rG1773eec6928f: [libcxx] Implement semaphores for windows
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
libcxx/src/support/win32/thread_win32.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
11–12 | A bit unrelated to this patch... I know that compile times are not a problem in libc++, but could you define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN before including windows.h? I don't think we use any of the following (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/winprog/using-the-windows-headers#faster-builds-with-smaller-header-files): Define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN to exclude APIs such as Cryptography, DDE, RPC, Shell, and Windows Sockets. | |
310 | No need for chrono::. milliseconds __ms = std::chrono::ceil<milliseconds>(__ns); Even if ceil is a C++17 addition, we only compile libc++ with C++17 or C++20. |
LGTM apart from unnecessary std:: (I wrote std:: without thinking too much before).
libcxx/src/support/win32/thread_win32.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
308 | OK. Now, there's no need for std::. :) |
libcxx/src/support/win32/thread_win32.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
308 | Doh, I thought I had removed the superfluous namespaces, will fix locally. |
Looks good enough to me. (But I'm also not a libc++ owner.)
Given that these semaphores cannot be shared across processes, there's possibly a more efficient way to implement them other than mapping them to the corresponding kernel synchronization object (just as a CRITICAL_SECTION is a more efficient mutex if you only need to exclude other threads in the same process). But that's probably not important at this stage.
(I'm amused by the bike-shedding over a nanosecond on the timeout. Windows only times things down to 100 ns.)
libcxx/src/support/win32/thread_win32.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
284 | The MS docs caution against using SEMAPHORE_ALL_ACCESS if you don't need it, but the explanation isn't clear. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sync/synchronization-object-security-and-access-rights Instead, they seem to be suggesting STANDARD_RIGHTS_ALL | SEMAPHORE_MODIFY_STATE, but I'm pretty sure that evaluates to the same thing. This _probably_ doesn't matter, since I don't think the end user will have a way to share these across processes; they aren't named, and--with nullptr for the security attributes--they cannot be inherited. Whether other processes can read or change the ownership and ACL for the object seems moot. |
libcxx/include/__threading_support | ||
---|---|---|
155 | Does this file actually #include <limits>? |
libcxx/include/__threading_support | ||
---|---|---|
154 | Let's use ::std::numeric_limits<long>::max(), just as good hygiene for a macro. |
Yeah, that'd be very much appreciated. With the latest couple patches and the updated instructions in D97166, it now runs pretty well out of the box overall. Continuous testing is sorely needed though, given the recent handful of breakages in MSVC configurations and/or when running tests overall. With current top of tree, there's still around 50 or so failed tests in a full check-cxx, but if someone would set up a buildbot, we could slap XFAIL on those, to be able to guard against further regressions and track what's left if things get cleaned up further.
libcxx/include/__threading_support | ||
---|---|---|
154 | Ok, will do. FWIW I copied the current form from the <semaphore> header, from the _LIBCPP_NO_NATIVE_SEMAPHORES case (which is the one used on e.g. apple platforms afaik), which also lacks the ::std:: prefix and the explicit <limits> include. | |
155 | It doesn't include <limits> yet, I can add that before pushing. |
Let's use ::std::numeric_limits<long>::max(), just as good hygiene for a macro.