Now that passes have support for running nested pipelines, the inliner can now allow for users to provide proper nested pipelines to use for optimization during inlining. This revision also changes the behavior of optimization during inlining to optimize before attempting to inline, which should lead to a more accurate cost model and prevents the need for users to schedule additional duplicate cleanup passes before/after the inliner that would already be run during inlining.
|380 ms||linux > HWAddressSanitizer-x86_64.TestCases::sizes.cpp|
Script: -- : 'RUN: at line 3'; /mnt/disks/ssd0/agent/llvm-project/build/./bin/clang --driver-mode=g++ -m64 -gline-tables-only -fsanitize=hwaddress -fuse-ld=lld -mcmodel=large -mllvm -hwasan-globals -mllvm -hwasan-use-short-granules -mllvm -hwasan-instrument-landing-pads=0 -mllvm -hwasan-instrument-personality-functions /mnt/disks/ssd0/agent/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/hwasan/TestCases/sizes.cpp -nostdlib++ -lstdc++ -o /mnt/disks/ssd0/agent/llvm-project/build/projects/compiler-rt/test/hwasan/X86_64/TestCases/Output/sizes.cpp.tmp
I don't quite get why you have to keep a separate builder callback for the default pass manager and build it on demand and cache it on every new encountered op name, why not just relying on the client adding it to the opPipelines StringMapwith an empty key for instance?
I'd explain that the operation has to be a transitive child: it can't be an arbitrary op
Comment it out of sync