For MASM syntax, the prefixes are not enclosed in braces.
The assembly code should like:
"evex vcvtps2pd xmm0, xmm1"
There are still some avx512 tests need to be improved with 'evex'
prefix. But I think it's better to discuss this syntax first.
Differential D90441
[X86] Add support for vex, vex2, vex3, and evex for MASM LiuChen3 on Oct 29 2020, 8:28 PM. Authored by
Details For MASM syntax, the prefixes are not enclosed in braces. "evex vcvtps2pd xmm0, xmm1" There are still some avx512 tests need to be improved with 'evex'
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Comment Actions
It should be 'continue'. Sorry for this mistake.
Comment Actions
It allows more than two, right? like {vex}{vex2}{vex3} instruction. I think it should be a bug for att.
Comment Actions
Yes, My previous statement is incorrect, it should be ‘two more’. Thanks for your correction.
|
Can we always assume the separator is \n\t?