wait and atomic directives are represented by OpenACCWaitConstruct, OpenACCAtmicConstruct in the parser. Those contrsuct were
not taken into account in the semantic check so far.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
flang/test/Semantics/acc-clause-validity.f90 | ||
---|---|---|
457 | should this be an array element or subarray? |
flang/test/Semantics/acc-clause-validity.f90 | ||
---|---|---|
457 | Yes. Will update the test. Anyway I'll need to add a check to enforce that in a follow-up patch. |
Comment Actions
@kiranchandramohan I removed the cache directive changes from this patch since I'm working on a more complex patch that will cover the specific restriction for cache.
should this be an array element or subarray?