Simplifies the implementation of TypeSize while retaining its interface.
There is no need for abstract concepts like LinearPolyBase, UnivariateLinearPolyBase or LinearPolySize.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
I like this patch as now I almost understand what these three classes are. But please see the comments.
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
87 | Would it be better to move the below comments to the derived classes? It is not immediately clear that the arrows represent relationship between classes. | |
105 | LHS and RHS (all capital) seems canonical abbreviation (892 occurences of LHS, 16 occurences of Lhs in CodeGen). Retaining the names would also make the diff smaller and make it a lot easier to review. | |
142 | Personally, this looks redundant to me (saving a few characters?). | |
157–158 | univariate dimension --> fixed quantity? |
Thx @barannikov88 for the comments. This patch is mostly to better understand what purpose TypeSize serves.
I'm trying to add a set of useful basic types D128052 and ElementCount / TypeSize will probably be tied to one of these at some point.
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
157–158 | Reworded it MinValue since this is what it is. |
Mostly fine by me, but I think the initial author should take a look.
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
103–104 | Here, and in the method below, the error message is outdated. | |
157–158 | Thanks. However, MinValue is an implementation detail that should not be exposed even in comments. | |
166–167 | This class is no longer "size", it is now "quantity". Either the comments should be fixed, or the class name. |
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
92 | Looks redundant. |
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
46 | Given that this is not a template over its unit, I think the doc should explicitly mention that the unit is bytes. | |
91–92 | This is now abstractly named ("Quantity"), but the documentation still refers to "size". | |
92 | Update doc | |
154–155 | Let's take this opportunity to document this non-obvious bool operator. |
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
157–158 |
Is that true ? I'm under the impression that this is what it was intended for in the original patch * Adds a TypeSize struct to represent the known minimum size of a type along with a flag to indicate that the runtime size is a integer multiple of that size |
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
157–158 | Let me rephrase "yes you're right that this is an implementation detail and it shouldn't be exposed but in that particular case it seems to be the exact semantic for the type". |
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
157–158 | Sorry for not being clear clear. |
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
46 | I've reworded. Let me know if it's better. | |
157–158 |
Sounds good to me, I went over the file and tried to use appropriate variable names where possible.
I think the comment refers to the class hierarchy that was in use before this patch. That said, and if you don't mind I'd rather do this in a second patch and keep this one NFC. There's already quite a few things going on. |
Adding the original author (@sdesmalen) to try to understand the purpose of these abstractions.
The original patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D88982) does not give any insight into why this is helpful.
(i personally suspect it was a part of series(?) to support spills to stack of scalable vectors)
The code in this patch looks good to me, and I think it turned easier to read than the LinearPoly* abstractions. So unless there is a good reason to keep them, LGTM.
The initial implementation was indeed too generic and complicated. It followed from discussions where we thought there might be value in keeping it generic so that we might extend it to more dimensions at some point. But given the complexity of adding even just one extra dimension, I don't see this happening any time soon (if ever). The refactor looks like a welcome improvement!
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h | ||
---|---|---|
46 | Seems fine to me. |
This commit breaks the build for me (and some of the buildbots): https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/16/builds/41419/steps/5/logs/stdio
CCACHE_CPP2=yes CCACHE_HASHDIR=yes /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/clang++ -DEXPENSIVE_CHECKS -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/lib/IR -I/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR -I/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/include -I/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/include -U_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -DNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -UNDEBUG -std=c++17 -MD -MT lib/IR/CMakeFiles/LLVMCore.dir/StructuralHash.cpp.o -MF lib/IR/CMakeFiles/LLVMCore.dir/StructuralHash.cpp.o.d -o lib/IR/CMakeFiles/LLVMCore.dir/StructuralHash.cpp.o -c /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/StructuralHash.cpp /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/StructuralHash.cpp:73:3: error: no type named 'StructuralHash' in namespace 'llvm::details'; did you mean '::details::StructuralHash'? details::StructuralHash H; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ::details::StructuralHash /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/StructuralHash.cpp:25:7: note: '::details::StructuralHash' declared here class StructuralHash { ^ /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/StructuralHash.cpp:79:3: error: no type named 'StructuralHash' in namespace 'llvm::details'; did you mean '::details::StructuralHash'? details::StructuralHash H; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ::details::StructuralHash /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/StructuralHash.cpp:25:7: note: '::details::StructuralHash' declared here class StructuralHash { ^ 2 errors generated.
Given that this is not a template over its unit, I think the doc should explicitly mention that the unit is bytes.