The problem with leak bug reports is that the most interesting event in the code is likely the one that did not happen -- lack of ownership change and lack of deallocation, which is often present within the same function that the analyzer inlined anyway, but not on the path of execution on which the bug occured. We struggle to understand that a function was responsible for freeing the memory, but failed.
D105819 added a new visitor to improve memory leak bug reports. In addition to inspecting the ExplodedNodes of the bug pat, the visitor tries to guess whether the function was supposed to free memory, but failed to. Initially (in D108753), this was done by checking whether a CXXDeleteExpr is present in the function. If so, we assume that the function was at least party responsible, and prevent the analyzer from pruning bug report notes in it. This patch improves this heuristic by recognizing all deallocator functions that MallocChecker itself recognizes, by reusing MallocChecker::isFreeingCall.
What about having a const reference, or a const pointer to const?