- Sort new checks by check name
- Sort changes to existing checks by check name
- Link check names to the check's documentation
- Add docs for changes to readability-simplify-boolean-expr
- Move check changes from "Improvements to clang-tidy" to "Changes in existing checks" section
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
223–229 | Small nit, not about this patch, but the documentation release process as a whole. Clang 13 got released with a lot of these placeholders still in the documentation. What could be done to ensure that this doesn't happen again? Perhaps keep the placeholders in the file but in a commented-out state? I'm aware of https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#update-documentation but in this case I guess it wasn't enough to capture this? |
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
223–229 | I think it would be reasonable to have them as comment blocks. I don't know if there's an automated process for generating/updating |
clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
223–229 | I was always under the impression those got removed when the release branch is created |
Small nit, not about this patch, but the documentation release process as a whole.
Clang 13 got released with a lot of these placeholders still in the documentation.
https://releases.llvm.org/13.0.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
They were never tidied up before release.
What could be done to ensure that this doesn't happen again? Perhaps keep the placeholders in the file but in a commented-out state?
I'm aware of https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#update-documentation but in this case I guess it wasn't enough to capture this?