Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Unit Tests
Time | Test | |
---|---|---|
100 ms | x64 windows > LLVM.CodeGen/XCore::threads.ll |
Event Timeline
Couple minor suggestions copied from review for D92900. Also, I think the macho test will fail right now since it references some symbols that don't exist there?
llvm/test/ThinLTO/X86/visibility-elf.ll | ||
---|---|---|
36 ↗ | (On Diff #310705) | Suggest making this comment a bit more explicit, e.g.: ;; Currently the visibility is not propagated onto an unimported function, because we don't have summaries for declarations. |
40 ↗ | (On Diff #310705) | Suggest making this comment something like: ;; This can be hidden, but we cannot communicate the declaration's visibility to other modules because |
llvm/test/ThinLTO/X86/visibility-macho.ll | ||
36 ↗ | (On Diff #310705) | The protected_* symbols are not defined in this test. |
Address comments.
llvm/test/ThinLTO/X86/visibility-elf.ll | ||
---|---|---|
36 ↗ | (On Diff #310705) | Thanks for the suggestions! |
llvm/test/ThinLTO/X86/visibility-macho.ll | ||
36 ↗ | (On Diff #310705) | My bad. protected is ELF specific and does not make sense on Mach-O. I'll delete protected_*. |