[VPlan] Add vplan native path vectorization test case for inner loop reduction

[Kazhuu]

Summary

Regarding this bug I posted earlier: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47035

After reading through LLVM source code and getting familiar with VPlan I was able to vectorize the code using by enabling VPlan native path. After talking with @fhahn he suggested that I contribute this as a test case. So here it is. I tried to follow the available guides how to do this best I could. I modified IR code by hand to have more clear variable names instead of numbers.

One thing what I'd like to get input from someone is that is current CHECK lines sufficient enough to verify that the inner loop has been vectorized properly?

[lattner]

Great idea! However, I think it would be better to get feedback from other folks who are actively contributing to the loop optimizer. Thank you for pushing on this!

[fhahn]

Thanks for the test! I left a suggestion on how to strengthen the CHECK lines in the test

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/vplan-vectorize-inner-loop-reduction.ll

19

I think in this case, it would be valuable to add checks for all vectorized blocks and their contents.

[Kazhuu]

Updated FileCheck to check more detailed about vectorized basic blocks. But I'd still want to get some pointers. Is this now too detailed checking and making the check too brittle for changes?

[fhahn]

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/vplan-vectorize-inner-loop-reduction.ll

25

please spell out the intrinsic here in the check line and below. We want to make sure the right intrinsic is called here.

[Kazhuu]

Typed all used LLVM intrinsic functions.

[fhahn]

LGTM thanks.

It looks like the latest diff is just the changes since the last review. Could you squash all changes together in a single diff?

Please let me know if you need someone to commit the change on your behalf. If so, please provide the name/email to use to set as author in git

[Kazhuu]

Squashed diff. And I need someone to commit this change for me. It can be done with the name Mauri Mustonen and email [e-mail], thanks.

[Kazhuu]

Ping! Does someone want to commit this for me with the name Mauri Mustonen and email [e-mail], thanks!

[fhahn]

In D87564#2313525, @Kazhuu wrote:

Ping! Does someone want to commit this for me with the name Mauri Mustonen and email [e-mail], thanks!

I missed that, sorry! Will commit shortly.

[Kazhuu]

Thank you!

llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/vplan-vectorize-inner-loop-reduction.ll

+; RUN: opt -loop-vectorize -force-vector-width=4 -enable-vplan-native-path -S %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Vectorize explict marked outer loop using vplan native path. Inner loop
+; contains simple double add reduction. IR is compiled and modified by hand
+; from following C code:
+; void inner_loop_reduction(const double* restrict in_a, const double* restrict in_b, double* restrict out)
+; {
+;     #pragma clang loop vectorize(enable)
+;     for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) {
+;         double a = in_a[i];
+;         double b = in_b[i];
+;         for (int j = 0; j < 10000; ++j) {
+;             a = a + b;
+;         }
+;         out[i] = a;
+;     }
+; }
+define void @inner_loop_reduction(double* noalias nocapture readonly %a.in, double* noalias nocapture readonly %b.in, double* noalias nocapture %c.out) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @inner_loop_reduction(
+; CHECK: fadd <4 x double>
+; CHECK: add nuw nsw <4 x i32>
+; CHECK: icmp eq <4 x i32>
+; CHECK: "llvm.loop.isvectorized", i32 1
+entry:
+  br label %for1.header
+
+for1.header:                                              ; preds = %entry
+  %indvar1 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvar11, %for1.latch ]
+  %a.ptr = getelementptr inbounds double, double* %a.in, i64 %indvar1
+  %a = load double, double* %a.ptr, align 8
+  %b.ptr = getelementptr inbounds double, double* %b.in, i64 %indvar1
+  %b = load double, double* %b.ptr, align 8
+  br label %for2.header
+
+for2.header:                                              ; preds = %for1.header, %for2.header
+  %indvar2 = phi i32 [ 0, %for1.header ], [ %indvar21, %for2.header ]
+  %a.reduction = phi double [ %a, %for1.header ], [ %a.reduction1, %for2.header ]
+  %a.reduction1 = fadd double %b, %a.reduction
+  %indvar21 = add nuw nsw i32 %indvar2, 1
+  %for2.cond = icmp eq i32 %indvar21, 10000
+  br i1 %for2.cond, label %for1.latch, label %for2.header
+
+for1.latch:                                               ; preds = %for2.header
+  %c.ptr = getelementptr inbounds double, double* %c.out, i64 %indvar1
+  store double %a.reduction1, double* %c.ptr, align 8
+  %indvar11 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvar1, 1
+  %for1.cond = icmp eq i64 %indvar11, 1000
+  br i1 %for1.cond, label %exit, label %for1.header, !llvm.loop !0
+
+exit:                                                    ; preds = %for1.latch
+  ret void
+}
+
+!0 = distinct !{!0, !1}
+!1 = !{!"llvm.loop.vectorize.enable", i1 true}