The VLLDM and VLSTM instructions are incompletely specified. They (potentially)
write (or read, respectively) registers Q0-Q7, VPR, and FPSCR, but the compiler
is unaware of it.
In the new test case cmse-vlldm-no-reorder.ll case the compiler missed an
anti-dependency and reordered a VLLDM ahead of the instruction, which stashed
the return value from the non-secure call, effectively clobbering said
value.
This test case does not fail with upstream LLVM, because of scheduling
differences and I couldn't find a test case for the VLSTM either.
RegState::Undef seems wrong: presumably the registers may actually contain data we need to preserve, or we wouldn't bother saving them in the first place.