Current assert wiht /EHa with
A single unwind edge may only enter one EH pad
invoke void @llvm.seh.try.begin() to label %invoke.cont1 unwind label %catch.dispatch2
IR:
%1 = catchpad within %0 [ptr null, i32 0, ptr null]
invoke void @llvm.seh.try.begin() to label %invoke.cont5 unwind label %catch.dispatch2
The problem is the invoke to llvm.seh.try.begin() missing "funclet"
Accodring: https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#ob-funclet
If any "funclet" EH pads have been entered but not exited (per the
description in the EH doc), it is undefined behavior to execute a
call or invoke.
To fix the problem, when emit seh_try_begin, call EmitSehScope,
instead of calling EmitRuntimeCallOrInvoke for proper "funclet"
gerenration.
Do we need to make the same change in EmitSEHTryStmt/ExitSEHTryStmt?
Is there some reason not to just call EmitSehTryScopeBegin here?