In-order bvh instructions don't require a waitcnt as order is
guaranteed.
However, waitcnt IS required for other image instruction types vs
bvh.
Pre-commit test for new functionality.
Paths
| Differential D114792
[AMDGPU] Test for in-order waitcnt insertion for bvh instructions ClosedPublic Authored by dstuttard on Nov 30 2021, 5:54 AM.
Details Summary In-order bvh instructions don't require a waitcnt as order is However, waitcnt IS required for other image instruction types vs Pre-commit test for new functionality.
Diff Detail
Event TimelineHerald added subscribers: kerbowa, t-tye, tpr and 4 others. · View Herald TranscriptNov 30 2021, 5:54 AM foad added a child revision: D114794: [AMDGPU] Add support for in-order bvh in waitcnt pass.Nov 30 2021, 6:06 AM This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Nov 30 2021, 6:26 AM Closed by commit rG17a3385c3538: [AMDGPU] Test for in-order waitcnt insertion for bvh instructions (authored by dstuttard). · Explain WhyDec 2 2021, 6:26 AM This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Revision Contents
Diff 391305 llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/waitcnt-bvh.mir
|
I think the canonical YAML format is to have --- before each function and ... after it, like this: