SVB.getStateManager().getOwningEngine().getAnalysisManager().getAnalyzerOptions()
is quite a mouthful and might involve a few pointer indirections to get
such a simple thing like an analyzer option.
This patch introduces an AnalyzerOptions reference to the SValBuilder
abstract class, while refactors a few cases to use this simpler accessor.
To be fair, I don't know why don't we use a plain old public const const field for this.
Similarly how AnalysisManager::options is defined.
What should be our preference? Should I follow the getter antipattern?