This is useful as it is sometimes better to try to canonicalize the transpose away after contract lowering rather than lowering it to a chain of scalar insert/extract.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
shouldn't we instead omit the transpose lowering pattern in places where don't want to apply it?
Comment Actions
Do you mean adding a if() addPattern<TransposeLowering> in or split the populateVectorContractLoweringPatterns? Splitting it would make sense, I just need to make sure every user gets updated.
Comment Actions
Changed it to a NFC change moving transpose lowering in a separate populate function.