This is an archive of the discontinued LLVM Phabricator instance.

[AIX] Support of Big archive (read)
Needs RevisionPublic

Authored by EGuesnet on Apr 16 2021, 7:58 AM.

Details

Reviewers
rupprecht
MaskRay
jhenderson
gbreynoo
DiggerLin
Group Reviewers
Restricted Project
Summary

Add support of AIX Big Archive. Read only.

Diff Detail

Event Timeline

There are a very large number of changes, so older changes are hidden. Show Older Changes
jhenderson added inline comments.Jul 9 2021, 2:07 AM
llvm/include/llvm/Object/Archive.h
373–375

Do you really need this length? Why is it uint32_t?

378

This is completely unthread safe - if you have a tool parsing two archives simultaneously, this will fail horribly. Do you really need it though? See my comments further down.

From reading the spec, the archive uses offsets everywhere and it should be simple to use the values stored in the member headers.

llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
485

Don't add this comment. We can see that these are child constructors by the function signature.

490

Use std::make_unique to create a unique pointer without needing to explicitly mention new. Same everywhere else you've done this.

500

Don't add a blank line at the function start.

649

It seems to me like the logic you've added to this function is a little odd. I think you may be trying too hard to match the existing logic, when it doesn't really make sense. In traditional UNIX ar format, each child is immediately followed by the next one (barring a possible even-alignment padding byte), stopping when you get to the end. My reading of the Big Archive spec is that the next child's offset is defined by the ar_nxtmem member of its header. You should just be using that and fl_lstmoff to identify if the current child is the last one or not. You can then check to see if the child goes past the buffer end, as per the existing check in this file.

EGuesnet updated this revision to Diff 358272.Jul 13 2021, 8:24 AM

[AIX] Support of Big archive (read)

Add support of AIX Big Archive. Read only.

EGuesnet edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)Jul 13 2021, 8:25 AM
EGuesnet marked 14 inline comments as done.Jul 13 2021, 8:44 AM

You should get some people who are more familiar with XCOFF/AIX to help review correctness. There has been a lot of development for this in other tools (e.g. llvm-readobj).

The IBM team that has sent PR about llvm-readobj is aware of this PR. I will recontact them.

I think I have respond to most of your comment. The main issue is the static variable. I need to know the current location to distinguish Fix length header and Object headers, and I have not found cleaner solution.
Note that it has been checked about multiple read: Rust loads libLLVM.so once, and can read multiple archive. It works, as the static variable is initialized correctly before being used. But it is sequential read.

llvm/include/llvm/Object/Archive.h
373–375

Maximal offset (in fixed length header) is stored as 20 bytes as decimal digit. So, maximal length is approximately 10^10. It is the total length of the archive. So, it must be uint64-t, not uint32_t.

378

Main trouble is with first read, to distinguish Fixed length header and other one.
We must know the current location, and modify it during read. This cannot be done in Parent (because of const) or Header (not access when it is required). Static variable in archive is the least bad solution I have found.

llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
649

I think you may be trying too hard to match the existing logic

Right.

My reading of the Big Archive spec is that the next child's offset is defined by the ar_nxtmem member of its header. You should just be using that and fl_lstmoff to identify if the current child is the last one or not. You can then check to see if the child goes past the buffer end, as per the existing check in this file.

But using offset needs to know the current location. You say in another comment this his highly not thread-safe and might be avoid.
Moreover, if I use fl_lstmoff instead of Length, I must have an access to Fixed length header. It is currently read and forbidden as length of object in archive in the only information we need.

1017

I have removed code related to symbol read.

llvm/lib/Object/ArchiveWriter.cpp
141

It can be reached by external tools (not llvm-ar), so I modifie it to use report_fatal_error().

llvm/test/Object/archive-big-read.test
2

I think it is OK now.
I have first done the test inspiring from other one, and they do not use theses convention and flag.

4

Done. See archive-big-extract.test.

EGuesnet updated this revision to Diff 358279.Jul 13 2021, 8:46 AM
EGuesnet marked 3 inline comments as done.

Use of clang-format.

I need to know the current location to distinguish Fix length header and Object headers, and I have not found cleaner solution.

I still don't understand why you need to know it to make this distinction. The two header types are completely different things as far as I understand the spec, used in different contexts. Could you read the Fixed Length header as the first part of reading the archive, and the object headers when reading individual children, then store them as members of the respective classes?

Note that it has been checked about multiple read: Rust loads libLLVM.so once, and can read multiple archive. It works, as the static variable is initialized correctly before being used. But it is sequential read.

Just because this works in one single case does not make this an appropriate design - in fact you haven't even tested the case where the issue is, as I bet that the thing you ran read the archives sequentially, not in parallel. What if I wrote a tool that wanted to read multiple Big-format archives in parallel, with one thread per archive? What would happen to the static variable on each individual thread?

Pseudo-code example reading algorithm that doesn't have the issues mentioned:

class Archive {
    FixedLengthHeader Header;
    std::vector<Child> Children;
    ArrayRef<uint8_t> Data;

    Archive(ArrayRef<uint8_t> Data) : Data(Data) {
      Header = reinterpret_cast<FixedLengthHeader> (Data.data());
      uint64_t Offset = Header->FirstChildOffset;
      // Check if archive is empty.
      Child C(Offset, this);
      while (C != nullptr) {
        Children.push_back(C);
        C = C.nextChild();
      }
    }
};

class Child {
    ObjectHeader Header;
    uint8_t *Payload;
    Archive &Parent;
    Child(uint64_t Offset, Archive &Archive) {
      // Check Archive data is large enough for offset + header size + payload size.
      Parent = Archive;
      Header = reinterpret_cast<ObjectHeader>(Parent->Data.data() + Offset);
      Payload = Parent->Data.data() + Offset + sizeof(Header);
    }
    Child *nextChild() {
      if (Header->nextOffset == 0)
        return nullptr;
      return Child(Header->nextOffset, Parent);
    }
};
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
649

It is currently read and forbidden as length of object in archive in the only information we need.

I don't understand this comment at all. Do you mean forgotten, not forbidden? Perhaps you could change how things are read and stored?

llvm/test/Object/archive-big-read.test
2

Older tests use older styles. We have developed better styles in the meantime which are preferred for newer tests.

Hi @jhenderson,
I cannot follow exactly what you propose, because llvm-ar (and maybe other tools) uses directly child_iterator. As this object does not have access to Archive (=Parent), it seems difficult to transfert Child vector of Archive to child_iterator. Moreover, I want to avoid to un-const Parent in Child.

Using the same idea, but not the same exact way, I propose:

  • Move FixedLengthHeader on Archive, and use it for Big Archive only.
  • Deal with first read (Fixed Length Header) in Archive creation, so any Child after do not care about it (one of the reason of static variable in previous version).
  • To distinguish Object and Member Table, I cannot use Next Member in Object Header, because it points to Member Table in the last Object; I cannot use Offset to Member Table of Fixed Length Header, because I do not memorize the current position. So, I use a trick: an Object must have a name (adding empty-file to an archive is non valid), and Member Table Header does not have name, so name field is "`\n" (terminator).
  • The child_begin_bigarchive() function is equivalent to child_begin(), but it deals correctly with Fixed Length Header.

getSize() and Big Archive Header initialiser are simplified, differences between usual Archive and Big Archive is deal during Child and Archive initialisation (so, correctly separated).

Free List is not yet supported: if you remove object in Archive, it will become unreadable by LLVM. Free List is complex, and not fully documented. I use report_fatal_error() if Free List is present in Archive (so, not 0), or if it is impossible to read it.

Esme added a subscriber: Esme.Aug 17 2021, 5:21 AM
Esme added inline comments.
llvm/test/Object/archive-big-extract.test
2

Can you please add the command of creating the ar file to the comment? Base on this patch, I am trying to enable tools (e.g. llvm-readobj) for ar format, but I am getting an error from BigArchiveMemberHeader::getSize() when applying this patch.

# Create the ar file under AIX
$ ar -v -q 1.a 1.o
$ llvm-ar p 1.a evenlen
llvm-ar: error: unable to load '2.a': truncated or malformed archive (characters in size field in archive header are not all decimal numbers: '\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\0005892' for archive member header at offset 128)
EGuesnet added inline comments.Aug 17 2021, 5:44 AM
llvm/test/Object/archive-big-extract.test
2

Hi @Esme ,
I just procede as:

$ # On AIX
$ echo evenlen > evenlen
$ ar -v -q 1.a evenlen
$ # On any server
$ llvm-ar p 1.a evenlen
evenlen

As your error message is related to 2.a, I think there is something wrong to reproduce your error.

Esme added inline comments.Sep 7 2021, 11:18 PM
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
1012

It's not correct to calculate the offset of the first archive member by Data.getBufferStart() + strlen(Magic) + sizeof(Archive::ArFixLenHdrType);, please use the value of ArFixLenHdr->FirstArOffset.
You can easily reproduce the bug if you test a archive file which contains a object file member like the comment I added before:

$ xlc 1.c -o 1.o
$ ar -v -q 1.a 1.o
$ llvm-ar tv 1.a
llvm-ar: error: unable to load '1.a': truncated or malformed archive (characters in size field in archive header are not all decimal numbers: '\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\0005892' for archive member header at offset 128)

The correct offset for this case should be 138 instead of 128.

EGuesnet added inline comments.Sep 14 2021, 12:51 AM
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
1012

First, LLVM is no more a priority of our team, so I cannot spend time to this PR.
Second, I am not able to reproduce. Please give me content of 1.c, and content of 1.a.

// small.c
int add_two (int a) {
        return a + 2;
}

$ xlc -v
C for AIX Compiler, Version 5

OK, really old, but we don't care for archive.

$ xlc small.c  -o small.o -c
$ ar -v -q small.a small.o

$ xxd small.a

00000000: 3c62 6967 6166 3e0a 3130 3730 2020 2020  <bigaf>.1070
00000010: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 3132 3332              1232
00000020: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
00000030: 3020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020  0
00000040: 2020 2020 3132 3820 2020 2020 2020 2020      128
00000050: 2020 2020 2020 2020 3132 3820 2020 2020          128
00000060: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 3020 2020              0
00000070: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
// End of Fixed-Length Header: size is 128
00000080: 3832 3020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020  820
00000090: 2020 2020 3130 3730 2020 2020 2020 2020      1070
000000a0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 3020 2020 2020 2020          0
000000b0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 3136 3331              1631
000000c0: 3630 3435 3039 2020 3020 2020 2020 2020  604509  0
000000d0: 2020 2020 3020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020      0
000000e0: 3634 3420 2020 2020 2020 2020 3720 2020  644         7
[...]

$ llvm-ar --version
LLVM version 13.0.0

$ llvm-ar t small.a
small.o # OK

Third, according documentation https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/aix/7.2?topic=formats-ar-file-format-big , Fixed-Length Header must have a size of 128. 138 is not valide.

Esme added inline comments.Sep 14 2021, 2:43 AM
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
1012

Thanks for your reply!

  1. If you are no longer following up on this patch, I'd be happy to continue your work. How do you think?
  1. In my previous comment, a binary member is added to the archive, while in your case, there is an object member (compiled with -c option) in archive.

You can also reproduce the issue if you add a dynamic lib to an archive.

$ cat 1.c
int main() {
return 1;
}
$ xlc 1.c -qmkshrobj -o libt.so
$ ar -v -q 1.a libt.so
$ xxd 1.a 
00000000: 3c62 6967 6166 3e0a 3134 3532 2020 2020  <bigaf>.1452    
00000010: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 3136 3134              1614
00000020: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020                  
00000030: 3020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020  0               
00000040: 2020 2020 3133 3420 2020 2020 2020 2020      134         
00000050: 2020 2020 2020 2020 3133 3420 2020 2020          134     
00000060: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 3020 2020              0   
00000070: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020                  
00000080: 0000 0000 0000 3131 3935 2020 2020 2020  ......1195    
// There are some padding between the Fixed-Length Header and the First member.  
00000090: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 3134 3532 2020            1452  
000000a0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 3020                0 
000000b0: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
  1. It's correct that Fixed-Length Header must have a size of 128. 138 is not valide. As above, there may be some padding between the Fixed-Length Header and the first member. So I think the value of ArFixLenHdr->FirstArOffset is the exact offset to the first member.
EGuesnet added inline comments.Sep 14 2021, 5:43 AM
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
1012

Using ArFixLenHdr->FirstArOffset does not work.

truncated or malformed archive (characters in name length field in archive header are not all decimal numbers: '' for archive member header at offset 68)

I do not know where this "68" is from.

In my opinion, this PR is complex enough. It might be accepted with as few changes as possible. So, without freelist, undocumented features... In a second time, you can create a new PR, to extend support of Big Archive, with new tests.

Esme added inline comments.Sep 14 2021, 7:31 PM
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
1012

OK, thanks!
Do you get the FirstArOffset value via StringRef(ArFixLenHdr->FirstArOffset, sizeof(ArFixLenHdr->FirstArOffset)).rtrim(' ').getAsInteger(10, Size) ?

EGuesnet added inline comments.Sep 15 2021, 3:28 AM
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
1012

My mistake, you are right. I take FirstArOffset directly...
But in order to treat the padded case, you must add test, with binary file. LLVM community want to avoid adding binary to test. So, I think again a separate PR after this one is preferable.

DiggerLin added inline comments.
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
104

There are common source code in the BigArchiveMemberHeader::BigArchiveMemberHeader and ArchiveMemberHeader::ArchiveMemberHeader , we can put the common code in the constructor of AbstractArchiveMemberHeader

DiggerLin added inline comments.Sep 28 2021, 12:16 PM
llvm/include/llvm/Object/Archive.h
345

I do not think we need a special child_begin_bigarchive() API for aix big ar here,
we can use the same API child_begin() , there is a member
Format in the Archive, we use have different implement of child_begin() base on the value of "Format" , if the
Format is K_AIXBIG(), we have different implement of child_begin().

gentle ping, we need the patch, can you help to speed it up ? @EGuesnet

jsji added a reviewer: Restricted Project.Sep 29 2021, 7:48 PM

Hi @DiggerLin,

I do not have time to improve this PR before begin of November. We have other priorities right now.
This PR has nearly 6 months, so, it can wait one more.

DiggerLin added inline comments.Sep 30 2021, 11:52 AM
llvm/include/llvm/Object/Archive.h
104–155

both the ArchiveMemberHeader and the BigArchiveMemberHeader has the "Archive const *Parent;" , can the member put in the AbstractArchiveMemberHeader ?

llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
62

if the RawHeaderPtr == nullptr is true , the value of ArMemHdr will be random here.

108

same problem as above.

175

the variable name "end" can not express the mean, maybe be "NameSize" or "NameLen" ?

337–392

there are several place use the almost the same code from line 308 to 320 . can we change these lines into a helper function?

564

change "Name.size() + Name.size() % 2" to ((Name.size()+1) >>1 ) << 1 ?

573

the Name.startswith("#1/")) is not for the Archive::K_AIXBIG. what happen if the AIXBIG archive file which has member name begin with "#/" here ?

DiggerLin requested changes to this revision.Sep 30 2021, 2:08 PM
DiggerLin added inline comments.
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
281

it looks the parameter Size not be used here?

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Sep 30 2021, 2:08 PM
This revision now requires review to proceed.Sep 30 2021, 2:15 PM
DiggerLin added inline comments.Oct 1 2021, 7:03 AM
llvm/include/llvm/Object/Archive.h
345

also using a separate interface child_begin_bigarchive , you can not use the API

iterator_range<child_iterator> children(Error &Err,
                                        bool SkipInternal = true) const {
  return make_range(child_begin(Err, SkipInternal), child_end());

the function file_magic llvm::identify_magic(StringRef Magic) should be modified to add big ar identification. otherwise object::createBinary will be error for big ar.

DiggerLin added inline comments.Oct 5 2021, 6:49 AM
llvm/include/llvm/Object/Archive.h
345

or you can call child_begin_bigarchive() in child_begin(Error &Err, bool SkipInternal = true) when Format is K_AIXBIG()

DiggerLin added inline comments.Oct 6 2021, 3:05 PM
llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
337–392

and I just wonder why you need the code

std::string Buf;
    raw_string_ostream OS(Buf);
    OS.write_escaped(
        StringRef(ArMemHdr->Size, sizeof(ArMemHdr->Size)).rtrim(" "));
    OS.flush();

to convert to std::string.

for the StringRef , there is a function str() to convert to std::string, why not use str() of StringRef ?

can you address the comment ,update the patch? we will approve it and We will create a following patch for the "Support of Big archive" @EGuesnet

jsji added a subscriber: jsji.Oct 12 2021, 6:48 AM

In my opinion, this PR is complex enough. It might be accepted with as few changes as possible. So, without freelist, undocumented features... In a second time, you can create a new PR, to extend support of Big Archive, with new tests.

As @EGuesnet mentioned above, I think he won't have time to address the comments in time.
However, we do depend on this patch for AIX in near future,
so I would suggest that we *accept* this patch *as it is* for now, and commit it as @EGuesnet suggested.

And @DiggerLin will post follow up patches immediately.

Is that OK for reviewers? @jhenderson @rupprecht @Esme ?

In my opinion, this PR is complex enough. It might be accepted with as few changes as possible. So, without freelist, undocumented features... In a second time, you can create a new PR, to extend support of Big Archive, with new tests.

As @EGuesnet mentioned above, I think he won't have time to address the comments in time.
However, we do depend on this patch for AIX in near future,
so I would suggest that we *accept* this patch *as it is* for now, and commit it as @EGuesnet suggested.

And @DiggerLin will post follow up patches immediately.

Is that OK for reviewers? @jhenderson @rupprecht @Esme ?

This patch is not in a suitable state ready for commit. I've highlighted a high number of issues, and I think there are some fundamental issues with the approach, which need addressing before it is acceptable to land this in LLVM. I haven't finished reviewing the whole patch yet either. I'm sorry if you need the patch in the near future. I can only suggest that you try implementing something yourself, perhaps by adopting and improving this patch, or starting an alternative version (inspired by this patch, and with credit given to @EGuesnet for their initial work, in the commit message).

llvm/include/llvm/Object/Archive.h
40–42

This comment is superfluous. clone always means this.

51–56

getOffset isn't named getRawOffset, so doesn't look like it belong in this block.

getRawName on the other hand looks like it does belong here.

Please make sure all comments follow the existing style. At the moment, comments are doxygen style (see e.g. getName). LLVM style also uses trailing full stops on comments - please add them where they are missing. That being said, don't bother with comments that provide no useful benefit beyond the method names. For example, you do not need this comment or the "Non-raw getters" comment: what benefit do they provide?

109

Please order const according to standard LLVM style, i.e. const T *.

If you're changing a function anyway, it makes sense to fix the style.

111

Please separate unrelated method declarations, or methods with non-single-line definitions with a blank line.

181

Do we actually need all these new constructors and assignment operators? Are they used?

183

Under what circumstances can C.Header be a nullptr?

186

Nit: add new line before this method.

187

Parent is a raw pointer, there's no need to std::move it.

374

Nit: please use // comments in this struct, as per the rest of the code.

As I understand it, this is a specific BigArchive class. Please rename it to be clear, e.g. BigArchiveFixLenHdr.

382

I think the presence of this member shows that the design is not right.

BigArchive is a kind of Archive. The members specific to BigArchive types (as opposed to e.g. traditional BSD or GNU archives) should not be present in a type that should be generic.

I think rather than, or possibly as well as, having this member, you really want to have concrete Archive subclasses that implement the relevant logic, and make Archive an abstract class.

llvm/lib/Object/Archive.cpp
46

I don't like this define. It is not guaranteed that all future archive magic is 8 characters long. I don't think it would be necessary if we made the Archive class a class hierarchy as suggested above.

I'm also slightly surprised that BigMagic doesn't start with !, but I assume that is correct and intentional.

66

Why has this code moved?

129

Terminator characters are cosmetic only, really, in regular archives too, but we still check them.

171–172

This comment has several typos in, and I'm not really sure what it is actually trying to say.

317–319

I'd prefer that this calculation be factored out into at least a variable, as I don't follow what it represents.

340

This pattern is a duplicate of most of the earlier expression. Put it in a variable rather than duplicating code.

430

getRawName appears not to trim the trailing spaces, but getRawUID does. This seems like a logical inconsistency that will likely lead to bugs.

506

These if/else checks clearly indicate that Child should really be BigArchiveChild and something else, sharing a common Child abstract base class.

660–665

Revert this change.

700–702

This looks like an unrelated formatting change.

jhenderson requested changes to this revision.Oct 12 2021, 7:55 AM
This revision now requires changes to proceed.Oct 12 2021, 7:55 AM
jsji added a comment.Oct 12 2021, 7:59 AM

I can only suggest that you try implementing something yourself, perhaps by adopting and improving this patch, or starting an alternative version (inspired by this patch, and with credit given to @EGuesnet for their initial work, in the commit message).

Thanks @jhenderson ! That would work too . @DiggerLin Let us do it -- you can create another patch based on this and give credit to @EGuesnet if he can NOT address the comment in time.

I can only suggest that you try implementing something yourself, perhaps by adopting and improving this patch, or starting an alternative version (inspired by this patch, and with credit given to @EGuesnet for their initial work, in the commit message).

Thanks @jhenderson ! That would work too . @DiggerLin Let us do it -- you can create another patch based on this and give credit to @EGuesnet if he can NOT address the comment in time.

yes, it is no problem for me. thanks .

Hi @jhenderson, @jsji , @DiggerLin,
As I said before, I do not have time to improve this PR before one or two months at least, as our priorities have shifted.
My proposal to @Esme about accepting the patch with minor changes was OK but now there are too much changes requested by reviewers.
So, I accept that you start an improvement / alternative version as long as you credit.

Please tag me when you will open your PR.
For your information, I have opened another PR about writing Big Archive here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104367 .

jsji added a comment.Oct 13 2021, 6:32 AM

Hi @jhenderson, @jsji , @DiggerLin,
As I said before, I do not have time to improve this PR before one or two months at least, as our priorities have shifted.
My proposal to @Esme about accepting the patch with minor changes was OK but now there are too much changes requested by reviewers.
So, I accept that you start an improvement / alternative version as long as you credit.

Please tag me when you will open your PR.
For your information, I have opened another PR about writing Big Archive here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104367 .

Great! Thank you for your kind and contribution to this! @EGuesnet

@DiggerLin Please credit and tag @EGuesnet in your new patch. Thanks.