The current diagnostic has confused users. The new wording is adapted from one suggested by Ian Lance Taylor.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Seems reasonable to me. I gues my only question is: will most users understand what the address-significance table is?
lld/ELF/InputFiles.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
596 | This should probably use the action section name, rather than hard-coding it in, since there's no requirement that SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG sections be a specific name, to my knowledge. The section index might also be good. See also the describe method used by llvm-readobj for how we report issues with sections there. |
This should probably use the action section name, rather than hard-coding it in, since there's no requirement that SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG sections be a specific name, to my knowledge. The section index might also be good. See also the describe method used by llvm-readobj for how we report issues with sections there.