A copy-paste from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41300#c4:
A cleaner repro:
#include <iostream> struct S { S() { std::cout << " Calling S()" << std::endl; } }; struct A { A() { std::cout << " Calling A()" << std::endl; } A(S s) { std::cout << " Calling A(S)" << std::endl; } }; struct B : virtual A { B() : A(S()) { std::cout << " Calling B()" << std::endl; } }; struct C : B { C() { std::cout << " Calling C()" << std::endl; } }; int main() { std::cout << "Constructing 'b':" << std::endl; B b; std::cout << "Constructing 'c':" << std::endl; C c; return 0; }The output of this program if you run it:
Constructing 'b':
Calling S() Calling A(S) Calling B()Constructing 'c':
Calling A() Calling B() Calling C()So, like, when calling the constructor for class B from class C, we silently (even under -Weverything) ignore the initializer A(S()). That is, we don't even compute S(), we just ignore it the whole initializer. But when we invoke B() directly, we do compute S().
This behavior implemented by compiling two versions of B(): one with the initializer for A and one without it, as can be seen in https://godbolt.org/z/8Sc-Re
However in the AST there's only one constructor for B(), so we should probably implement a runtime branch while modeling a CXXCtorInitializer in an inlined constructor call.
This patch adds the run-time CFG branch that would skip initialization of virtual base classes depending on whether the constructor is called from a superclass constructor or not. Previously the Static Analyzer was already skipping virtual base-class initializers in such constructors, but it wasn't skipping its arguments and their potential side effects, which was causing a crash (and was generally incorrect). The previous skipping behavior is replaced with a hard assertion that we're not even getting there due to how our CFG works.
The new CFG element is under a CFG build option so that not to break other consumers of the CFG by this change. Static Analyzer support for this change is implemented.
I've no idea how to write CFGBuilder code correctly because it's confusing because everything depends on the global mutable state of Block and Succ in the CFGBuilder. But i hope that initializers-cfg-output.cpp, together with the newly added test, provides some basic test coverage for my code.
Note that a similar functionality is necessary for destructors of virtual bases, but it remains to be done for now. We should be able to re-use the same terminator kind.
Bases -> Base