Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
Event Timeline
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
14 ↗ | (On Diff #187779) | @hans I am not sure if it's best to list all languages supported (i.e. OpenMP, Renderscript, CUDA are still missing) or alternatively we could change to something like - Clang C language family frontend? The latter one is taken from the main page: https://clang.llvm.org/. Although, OpenMP is missing on the main page. |
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
14 ↗ | (On Diff #187779) | Well, generally speaking, OpenMP is not a programming language, it is an API, i.e. just an extension for C/C++/Fortran. Not sure that it must be in the list of the actual languages. |
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
14 ↗ | (On Diff #187779) | Ok, then I guess it will be ok to leave it out in this update to the release notes too! |
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
228 ↗ | (On Diff #187779) | Why the "C" is removed ? |
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
228 ↗ | (On Diff #187779) | Should we call the section like: "OpenCL Support in Clang"? |
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
14 ↗ | (On Diff #187779) | I agree with Alexey. OpenMP is an API specification not quite a language yet. |
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
228 ↗ | (On Diff #187779) | I would like to leave "Changes" in as it described the difference in this release. And I think "Language" should stay to be more precise that this doesn't cover libraries or runtime. So I was think of either: I am a bit worried about the last one since it might link to the OpenCL C++ spec... even though it was used in the past release notes... but now that the direction has been changed I am not sure. Any opinion? |
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | ||
---|---|---|
228 ↗ | (On Diff #187779) | Within a day or two would be good. But it looks like it got accepted now. Will you commit to the branch, or would you like me to do it for you? |
Committed to the release branch r354799.
FYI, I did a couple of formatting changes and typo fixes.