This makes using !dag more convenient in some cases.
Change-Id: I0a8c35e15ccd1ecec778fd1c8d64eee38d74517c
Paths
| Differential D44111
TableGen: Allow ? in lists ClosedPublic Authored by nhaehnle on Mar 5 2018, 12:19 PM.
Details Summary This makes using !dag more convenient in some cases. Change-Id: I0a8c35e15ccd1ecec778fd1c8d64eee38d74517c
Diff Detail
Event Timelinenhaehnle added a parent revision: D44110: TableGen: Add !dag function for construction.Mar 5 2018, 12:20 PM Comment Actions One test nit. Perhaps should be fixed in a separate patch before this one. LGTM otherwise.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mar 6 2018, 1:38 PM
Closed by commit rL327493: TableGen: Allow ? in lists (authored by nha). · Explain WhyMar 14 2018, 4:03 AM This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Revision Contents
Diff 137059 lib/TableGen/TGParser.cpp
test/TableGen/dag-functional.td
|
I assume we do care about the value of the dag ret, not just the fact that the record got defined. If so, I think there's a CHECK missing here and in the rest of the checks in the file.