Add support for RecordType in getTypeAsString
Depends on D153461
Differential D153467
[flang] Enhance getTypeAsString for RecordType clementval on Jun 21 2023, 2:04 PM. Authored by
Details
Diff Detail
Event TimelineComment Actions What is the motivation to use the component type for the name instead of the record type name instead? Comment Actions Although technically it would be useful to reuse recipe for similar types, seems most useful to use record name. Looks good to me in its current form. Comment Actions Another point is that similar type may have different user defined assignments, initial values and final routines (not sure if this matter in the recipes though). |