Also remove clang-query related code, since it's unused now.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
I like the removal of a dependency, especially since clang-tidy shows better diagnostics.
Some questions and remarks.
libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst | ||
---|---|---|
101 | Can we remove clang-query from the Dockerfile too or is it still needed there? | |
101 | I think there are more dependencies for clang-tidy with the plugins, is that correct? | |
libcxx/include/__memory_resource/monotonic_buffer_resource.h | ||
83 ↗ | (On Diff #489398) | Is this intended in this patch? It feels completely unrelated to test refactoring. |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/CMakeLists.txt | ||
8–10 | Not entirely related to this change, but is there any documentation describing how to use this locally. | |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
37 | I assume this has to to with the list of hasName above. If so let's move the comment there and please elaborate a bit more why these functions are excluded. Just to make sure that it's clear why this is needed. A question, is std::ranges::__stable_sort also added to this list? Or only names in std:: ? |
Address comments
libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst | ||
---|---|---|
101 | IIRC clang-query part of the clang-tools package, which I think we still depend on. I might be wrong about that though. | |
101 | Kind-of, depends on how your OS packages things. If the headers and object files are included within the same package, there are no additional dependencies. Added a comment. | |
libcxx/include/__memory_resource/monotonic_buffer_resource.h | ||
83 ↗ | (On Diff #489398) | |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/CMakeLists.txt | ||
8–10 | No. I can write some short documentation, but I don't know how much help this will actually be, since this can be very environment-specific. I guess we could expand this with problems people had when setting it up, so others have an easier time. | |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
37 | I'm, not sure what you are referring to with I assume this has to do with the list of hasName above. The functions are excluded because they can't be marked [[gnu::always_inline]] for various reasons. This check only looks through functions, so ranges::__stable_sort isn't related. |
libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst | ||
---|---|---|
101 | It's indeed part of clang-tools and I think there's nothing there we use: | |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/CMakeLists.txt | ||
8–10 | If you write an initial version I'll test it on Debian and update if needed. I want to use this myself to add some additional checks; also to get a bit of experience with writing my own checks. | |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
37 | Can you then add a comment like These functions are excluded because they can't be marked [[gnu::always_inline]]. |
Address comments
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
37 | It would also be ignored: https://godbolt.org/z/YPdY6WqP7 |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
25–35 | Can you not use the hasAnyName matcher here instead? |
Address comments
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
25–35 | Thanks, I wasn't aware of that matcher. |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
37 | Then I think it would be better to test against the fully qualified name. |
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
37 | I don't. Testing against the fully qualified name is a lot harder AFAICT, and we don't have functions with the same name in different namespaces normally, especially the ones listed here. The proper solution would be to hide them from the ABI without having [[gnu::always_inline]] on them. Then we wouldn't have to ignore the functions here and we don't inline everything with GCC. |
LGTM modulo one comment.
libcxx/test/tools/clang_tidy_checks/hide_from_abi.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
37 | Can you add that information to the comment. I still prefer FQN, but if that's hard let's document it. |
Can we remove clang-query from the Dockerfile too or is it still needed there?