Using clang-tidy on LLVM itself (the proverbial eating your own dogfood) is a little different from using a clang-tidy installation on another source tree. clang-tidy needs to know where to find include files within the LLVM source tree itself.
This is a Python script, tidy-llvm, which finds the root of the llvm tree, verifies LLVM build requirements (LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS:STRING=clang;clang-tools-extra and CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS:UNINITIALIZED=On), constructs llvm and current directory include paths, concatenates up an argument list and then runs clang-tidy on the .h and .cpp files on the command line.
tidy-llvm XXAsmPrinter.cpp generates a clang-tidy command line that looks like:
clang-tidy -checks="llvm-*" -p .../build XXAsmPrinter.cpp -- -I. -IAsmParser -IGISel -IDisassembler -ITargetInfo -IXX -IMCTargetDesc -I.../libcxx/include -I.../build/include -I.../llvm/include
I'm pretty sure that the llvm include directories (-I.../libcxx/include -I.../build/include -I.../llvm/include others?) have to be enumerated rather than simply inheriting where clang-tidy thinks they are in the installation. Unless I manually specified them, clang-tidy wasn't finding them.
I think someone more expert in the build machinery could improve it greatly. For example, it currently gets a strange error about __config_site (which doesn't prevent the rest of the clang-tidy checking):
Error while processing path to XXAsmPrinter.cpp. path/libcxx/include/__config:13:10: error: '__config_site' file not found [clang-diagnostic-error] #include <__config_site>
config_site is indeed not in my build tree. There is a file libcxx/include/config_site.in but that's it. Again, someone more knowledgable in the build machinery might understand why this is the case.
clang-tidy still interprets its .clang_tidy file wherever it finds it. It's better to leave most of the -checks there. The tidy-llvm Python script itself is currently set to -checks=\"llvm-*\". I set modernize in the .clang_tidy file for my backend. I can imagine having a .clang-tidy file at the root of the llvm tree.
Adding support for run-clang-tidy would be nice but for tidying individual files it really won't matter.