This reverts commit 5d1df6d220f1d6f726d9643848679d781750db64.
There is a strong objection to this change:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106436#2905618
Differential D106847
Revert "sanitizers: increase .clang-format columns to 100" dvyukov on Jul 26 2021, 10:04 PM. Authored by
Details This reverts commit 5d1df6d220f1d6f726d9643848679d781750db64. There is a strong objection to this change:
Diff Detail
Unit Tests Event TimelineComment Actions Approved (though usually reverts like this (especially of your own patches, shortly after originally committed, etc) can be submitted without pre-commit review, if you like) - happy if you'd like to wait a few days for other discussion, though. Comment Actions Oh, I just meant if you wanted to wait until/if other people had feedback on the patch, that'd be OK. But otherwise you can go ahead and commit the revert with my approval. Comment Actions I think a discussion needs to be made before the revert is commited (which can cause churn by itself). FWIW customizing ColumnLimit: isn't uncommon in llvm-project: % rg ColumnLimit: -g .clang-format -l | grep -v compiler-rt pstl/.clang-format libcxx/.clang-format clang-tools-extra/test/.clang-format clang/test/.clang-format llvm/test/.clang-format lldb/test/Shell/.clang-format If we drop tests, pstl and libcxx diverge from the llvm style. Comment Actions Coding standards for column width are about source code(.c, .cpp, .h), so we can drop tests, not many ( i think), run clang-format on them. pstl comes from a single commit - https://github.com/intel/parallelstl. libcxx change .clang-format standard recently(15 April 2021) in https://reviews.llvm.org/D99691#2690379. And they are always open to tweak it. Comment Actions You are getting me into a deadlock state, I cannot both revert and not revert this :) |