[SCEV] Add false->any implication

[mkazantsev]

Summary

By definition of Implication operator, false -> true and false -> false. It means that
false implies any predicate, no matter true or false. We don't need to go any further
trying to prove the statement we need and just always say that false implies it in this case.

In practice it means that we are trying to prove something guarded by false condition,
which means that this code is unreachable, and we can safely prove any fact or perform any
transform in this code.

[mkazantsev]

Theoretically it should help, but maybe the price of triggered transformations will outweight the benefit. Can we run the automation to figure out if it actually helps?

[lebedev.ri]

In D98706#2628906, @mkazantsev wrote:

Theoretically it should help, but maybe the price of triggered transformations will outweight the benefit. Can we run the automation to figure out if it actually helps?

https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=49d0e115d5df40aa89339f4ace7a8dee378c03bb&to=369fd47a59582996bae60e37856b35718f8f4877&stat=instructions

[mkazantsev]

In D98706#2628911, @lebedev.ri wrote:

In D98706#2628906, @mkazantsev wrote:

Theoretically it should help, but maybe the price of triggered transformations will outweight the benefit. Can we run the automation to figure out if it actually helps?

https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=49d0e115d5df40aa89339f4ace7a8dee378c03bb&to=369fd47a59582996bae60e37856b35718f8f4877&stat=instructions

Thanks Roman! Let's see if it gives us something..

[lebedev.ri]

In D98706#2628924, @mkazantsev wrote:

In D98706#2628911, @lebedev.ri wrote:

In D98706#2628906, @mkazantsev wrote:

Theoretically it should help, but maybe the price of triggered transformations will outweight the benefit. Can we run the automation to figure out if it actually helps?

TBF, we don't actually know what causes the cost there, do we?
Perhaps the change is cheap, but it happens to be so good that it enables further optimizations (or at least attempts thereof).

https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=49d0e115d5df40aa89339f4ace7a8dee378c03bb&to=369fd47a59582996bae60e37856b35718f8f4877&stat=instructions

Thanks Roman! Let's see if it gives us something..

And apparently done.
Same situation :)

[mkazantsev]

The cost is spread over all SCEV I guess. If we want to improve it, we should make it sitch by sitch. Apparently this sitution is rare. :( Well, it was worth trying.

[nikic]

D90926 was a pretty nice improvement to isImpliedCond performance. Our test coverage is really bad though ("deleting a transform breaks no tests" level bad), so I didn't pursue that further at the time.

[lebedev.ri]

In D98706#2628952, @mkazantsev wrote:

The cost is spread over all SCEV I guess. If we want to improve it, we should make it sitch by sitch. Apparently this sitution is rare. :( Well, it was worth trying.

While not a compile time win, this seems like an improvement on it's own to me.
The change itself is rather cheap (a plain single comparison).

That being said, i think i'm failing to understand why it implies *anything*?

[reames]

This seems like a useful change to me purely on the transform impact. The compile time appears to be a wash. A refreshed patch which simply removed the misleading compile time comment would likely warrant an LGTM.

I would suggest auditing the callers to make sure perform checks in the right order though. This could be surprising if the caller isn't expecting to be analyzing potentially dead code.

Maybe even we should assert this condition? Not because it's wrong, but passing a trivial condition here really seems like a missing compile time optimization in each caller? (This is only a lightly considered suggestion, feel free to ignore if a glance at code shows me off base.)

[mkazantsev]

In D98706#2629115, @lebedev.ri wrote:

That being said, i think i'm failing to understand why it implies *anything*?

Just by definition of implication: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table#Logical_implication

In terms of compiler code, "guarded by false" means unreachable code, and basically any transform there is legal.

In D98706#2630172, @reames wrote:

I would suggest auditing the callers to make sure perform checks in the right order though. This could be surprising if the caller isn't expecting to be analyzing potentially dead code.

The main users of this are is[Loop/BasicBlock]EntryGuardedByCond. They may be called by loop passes in arbitrary order. Imagine that a loop has been unswitched with some stay-in-loop condition turned to false. The consequent loop pass still thinks it's a loop (because dead CFG wasn't broken yet) and will analyze it as it normally would. I don't think every loop path should be doing this check on its own.

[mkazantsev]

Removed comments regarding compile time.

[lebedev.ri]

In D98706#2634090, @mkazantsev wrote:

In D98706#2629115, @lebedev.ri wrote:

That being said, i think i'm failing to understand why it implies *anything*?

Just by definition of implication: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table#Logical_implication

Right, thanks for reminding me of that.

In terms of compiler code, "guarded by false" means unreachable code, and basically any transform there is legal.

Right. Iff the "guarded by false" dominates the code. (i.e. the code can only be reached through the guard)

With that spelled out explicitly, this looks good to me, thanks!

[lebedev.ri]

(compile time impact is noise here, it was https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=49d0e115d5df40aa89339f4ace7a8dee378c03bb&to=369fd47a59582996bae60e37856b35718f8f4877&stat=instructions and now is https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=26ec76add5cf0689dc545ade9a39eef58db6e3d7&to=c791781434e52ef11c02bd04430b43c5a8c1acff&stat=instructions)

[uabelho]

I wrote a PR about a verifier error showing up with this commit:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51179

[uabelho]

In D98706#2899638, @uabelho wrote:

I wrote a PR about a verifier error showing up with this commit:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51179

Ping @mkazantsev : Do you know if that verifier error is anything to worry about?

llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp

bool ScalarEvolution::isLoopEntryGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
 
   return isBasicBlockEntryGuardedByCond(L->getHeader(), Pred, LHS, RHS);
 }
 
 bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCond(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred, const SCEV *LHS,
                                     const SCEV *RHS,
                                     const Value *FoundCondValue, bool Inverse,
                                     const Instruction *Context) {
+  // False conditions implies anything. Do not bother analyzing it further.
+  if (FoundCondValue ==
+      ConstantInt::getBool(FoundCondValue->getContext(), Inverse))
+    return true;
+
   if (!PendingLoopPredicates.insert(FoundCondValue).second)
     return false;
 
   auto ClearOnExit =
       make_scope_exit([&]() { PendingLoopPredicates.erase(FoundCondValue); });
 
   // Recursively handle And and Or conditions.
   if (const BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(FoundCondValue)) {

llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/max-backedge-taken-count-guard-info.ll

 exit:
   ret void
 }
 
 define void @crash(i8* %ptr) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: 'crash'
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Classifying expressions for: @crash
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    %text.addr.5 = phi i8* [ %incdec.ptr112, %while.cond111 ], [ null, %while.body ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {null,+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %while.cond111: Computable, %while.body: Variant }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    -->  {null,+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111> U: full-set S: full-set    Exits: <<Unknown>>    LoopDispositions: { %while.cond111: Computable, %while.body: Variant }
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    %incdec.ptr112 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %text.addr.5, i64 -1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {(-1 + null)<nuw><nsw>,+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %while.cond111: Computable, %while.body: Variant }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    -->  {(-1 + null)<nuw><nsw>,+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111> U: full-set S: full-set    Exits: <<Unknown>>    LoopDispositions: { %while.cond111: Computable, %while.body: Variant }
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    %lastout.2271 = phi i8* [ %incdec.ptr126, %while.body125 ], [ %ptr, %while.end117 ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {%ptr,+,1}<nuw><%while.body125> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: {(-2 + null)<nuw><nsw>,+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111> LoopDispositions: { %while.body125: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    -->  {%ptr,+,1}<nuw><%while.body125> U: full-set S: full-set    Exits: {(-2 + null)<nuw><nsw>,+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111>    LoopDispositions: { %while.body125: Computable }
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    %incdec.ptr126 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %lastout.2271, i64 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {(1 + %ptr)<nuw>,+,1}<nuw><%while.body125> U: [1,0) S: [1,0) Exits: {(-1 + null)<nuw><nsw>,+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111> LoopDispositions: { %while.body125: Computable }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    -->  {(1 + %ptr)<nuw>,+,1}<nuw><%while.body125> U: [1,0) S: [1,0)    Exits: {(-1 + null)<nuw><nsw>,+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111>    LoopDispositions: { %while.body125: Computable }
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Determining loop execution counts for: @crash
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.body125: backedge-taken count is {(-2 + (-1 * %ptr) + null),+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111>
-; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.body125: max backedge-taken count is -1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.body125: max backedge-taken count is -2
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.body125: Predicated backedge-taken count is {(-2 + (-1 * %ptr) + null),+,-1}<nw><%while.cond111>
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   Predicates:
 ; CHECK:       Loop %while.body125: Trip multiple is 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.cond111: Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.cond111: Unpredictable max backedge-taken count.
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.cond111: Unpredictable predicated backedge-taken count.
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.body: Unpredictable backedge-taken count.
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Loop %while.body: Unpredictable max backedge-taken count.

llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/2011-10-27-lftrnull.ll

 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[FOR_BODY_I86:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       for.body.i86:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP196_I:%.*]] = icmp ult i32 0, undef
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CMP196_I]], label [[FOR_BODY21_LR_PH_I:%.*]], label [[FOR_END_I129:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       for.body21.lr.ph.i:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[FOR_BODY21_I:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       for.body21.i:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[DESTYPIXELPTR_010_I:%.*]] = phi i8* [ null, [[FOR_BODY21_LR_PH_I]] ], [ [[INCDEC_PTR_I:%.*]], [[IF_END_I126:%.*]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[X_09_I:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, [[FOR_BODY21_LR_PH_I]] ], [ [[INC_I125:%.*]], [[IF_END_I126]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 undef, label [[IF_END_I126]], label [[IF_ELSE_I124:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       if.else.i124:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    store i8 undef, i8* [[DESTYPIXELPTR_010_I]], align 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[IF_END_I126]]
 ; CHECK:       if.end.i126:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INCDEC_PTR_I]] = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* [[DESTYPIXELPTR_010_I]], i32 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INC_I125]] = add nuw i32 [[X_09_I]], 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXITCOND:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[INC_I125]], undef
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXITCOND]], label [[FOR_BODY21_I]], label [[FOR_END_I129_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 true, label [[FOR_BODY21_I]], label [[FOR_END_I129_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       for.end.i129.loopexit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[FOR_END_I129]]
 ; CHECK:       for.end.i129:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 false, label [[FOR_BODY_I86]], label [[WHILE_COND_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       while.end:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[BAIL:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       bail:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    unreachable

llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/X86/pr35406.ll

 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
 ; RUN: opt -S -indvars %s | FileCheck %s
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128-ni:1"
 target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
 
 define i32 @testDiv(i8* %p, i64* %p1) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @testDiv(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP1:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop1:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDVARS_IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[LOOP2_EXIT:%.*]] ], [ 8, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXITCOND3:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[INDVARS_IV]], 15
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXITCOND3]], label [[EXIT:%.*]], label [[GENERAL_CASE24:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXITCOND:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[INDVARS_IV]], 15
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXITCOND]], label [[EXIT:%.*]], label [[GENERAL_CASE24:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       general_case24:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 false, label [[LOOP2_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[LOOP2_EXIT]]
 ; CHECK:       loop2.preheader:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = udiv i64 14, [[INDVARS_IV]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = udiv i64 60392, [[TMP0]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP2:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop2:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDVARS_IV1:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[TMP1]], [[LOOP2_PREHEADER]] ], [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2:%.*]], [[LOOP2]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOCAL_2_57:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[I7:%.*]], [[LOOP2]] ], [ 1, [[LOOP2_PREHEADER]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]] = add nsw i64 [[INDVARS_IV1]], -1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[INDVARS_IV1]], -1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I4:%.*]] = load atomic i64, i64* [[P1:%.*]] unordered, align 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I6:%.*]] = sub i64 [[I4]], [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT2]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    store atomic i64 [[I6]], i64* [[P1]] unordered, align 8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I7]] = add nuw nsw i32 [[LOCAL_2_57]], 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXITCOND:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[I7]], 9
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXITCOND]], label [[LOOP2_EXIT_LOOPEXIT:%.*]], label [[LOOP2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 false, label [[LOOP2_EXIT_LOOPEXIT:%.*]], label [[LOOP2]]
 ; CHECK:       loop2.exit.loopexit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP2_EXIT]]
 ; CHECK:       loop2.exit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[INDVARS_IV]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 false, label [[EXIT]], label [[LOOP1]]
 ; CHECK:       exit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 0
 ;

 }
 
 define i32 @testRem(i8* %p, i64* %p1) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @testRem(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP1:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop1:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOCAL_0_:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 8, [[ENTRY:%.*]] ], [ [[I9:%.*]], [[LOOP2_EXIT:%.*]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXITCOND1:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[LOCAL_0_]], 15
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXITCOND1]], label [[EXIT:%.*]], label [[GENERAL_CASE24:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXITCOND:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[LOCAL_0_]], 15
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXITCOND]], label [[EXIT:%.*]], label [[GENERAL_CASE24:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       general_case24:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 false, label [[LOOP2_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[LOOP2_EXIT]]
 ; CHECK:       loop2.preheader:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = udiv i32 14, [[LOCAL_0_]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = udiv i32 60392, [[TMP0]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP2:%.*]] = mul i32 [[TMP1]], -1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP3:%.*]] = mul i32 [[TMP2]], [[TMP0]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP4:%.*]] = sext i32 [[TMP3]] to i64
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP5:%.*]] = add nsw i64 [[TMP4]], 60392
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP2:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop2:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDVARS_IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[TMP5]], [[LOOP2_PREHEADER]] ], [ [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT:%.*]], [[LOOP2]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOCAL_2_57:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[I7:%.*]], [[LOOP2]] ], [ 1, [[LOOP2_PREHEADER]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]] = add nsw i64 [[INDVARS_IV]], -1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I4:%.*]] = load atomic i64, i64* [[P1:%.*]] unordered, align 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I6:%.*]] = sub i64 [[I4]], [[INDVARS_IV_NEXT]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    store atomic i64 [[I6]], i64* [[P1]] unordered, align 8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I7]] = add nuw nsw i32 [[LOCAL_2_57]], 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXITCOND:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[I7]], 9
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXITCOND]], label [[LOOP2_EXIT_LOOPEXIT:%.*]], label [[LOOP2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 false, label [[LOOP2_EXIT_LOOPEXIT:%.*]], label [[LOOP2]]
 ; CHECK:       loop2.exit.loopexit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP2_EXIT]]
 ; CHECK:       loop2.exit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I9]] = add nuw nsw i32 [[LOCAL_0_]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 false, label [[EXIT]], label [[LOOP1]]
 ; CHECK:       exit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 0
 ;

llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/trivial-guard.ll

 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_1:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[IV_NEXT_1:%.*]], [[GUARDED_1:%.*]] ], [ 0, [[LOOP_1_PREHEADER]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CHECK_1:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV_1]], [[X:%.*]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CHECK_1]], label [[GUARDED_1]], label [[FAIL_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       guarded.1:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT_1]] = add nuw i32 [[IV_1]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOOP_COND_1:%.*]] = call i1 @cond()
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[LOOP_COND_1]], label [[LOOP_1]], label [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop.2:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_2:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[IV_NEXT_2:%.*]], [[GUARDED_2:%.*]] ], [ 0, [[LOOP_2_PREHEADER]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CHECK_2:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV_2]], [[X]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CHECK_2]], label [[GUARDED_2]], label [[FAIL_LOOPEXIT1:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 true, label [[GUARDED_2:%.*]], label [[FAIL_LOOPEXIT1:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       guarded.2:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT_2]] = add nuw i32 [[IV_2]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOOP_COND_2:%.*]] = call i1 @cond()
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[LOOP_COND_2]], label [[LOOP_2]], label [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT2:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       exit.loopexit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[EXIT:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       exit.loopexit2:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[EXIT]]
 ; CHECK:       exit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void

 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test_02(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 false, label [[LOOP_1_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[LOOP_2_PREHEADER:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop.2.preheader:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP_2:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop.1.preheader:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LOOP_1:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop.1:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_1:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[IV_NEXT_1:%.*]], [[GUARDED_1:%.*]] ], [ 0, [[LOOP_1_PREHEADER]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CHECK_1:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV_1]], [[X:%.*]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CHECK_1]], label [[GUARDED_1]], label [[FAIL_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 true, label [[GUARDED_1:%.*]], label [[FAIL_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       guarded.1:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT_1]] = add nuw i32 [[IV_1]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOOP_COND_1:%.*]] = call i1 @cond()
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[LOOP_COND_1]], label [[LOOP_1]], label [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       loop.2:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_2:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[IV_NEXT_2:%.*]], [[GUARDED_2:%.*]] ], [ 0, [[LOOP_2_PREHEADER]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CHECK_2:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV_2]], [[X]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CHECK_2:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[IV_2]], [[X:%.*]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CHECK_2]], label [[GUARDED_2]], label [[FAIL_LOOPEXIT1:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       guarded.2:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT_2]] = add nuw i32 [[IV_2]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LOOP_COND_2:%.*]] = call i1 @cond()
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[LOOP_COND_2]], label [[LOOP_2]], label [[EXIT_LOOPEXIT2:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       exit.loopexit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[EXIT:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       exit.loopexit2: