Details
- Reviewers
ftynse - Commits
- rGfa9851ebfee4: [MLIR] NFC: simplify PresburgerSet::isEqual
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
We generally use code review for everything except build unbreaks, reverts and minor syntactic changes such as typos.
We generally use code review for everything except build unbreaks, reverts and minor syntactic changes such as typos.
I have a more liberal view here, I've been performing refactoring and other kind of NFC or minor change without pre-commit reviews. In general many people (including me) are just reviewing a few things post-commit.
I should add this is also very contextual: I wouldn't refactor linalg without asking ntv@ or the LLVM dialect without asking @zinenko, but for example such minor things in PresburgerSet made by the main authors/contributors of this component looks fine to me to land directly if they are confident enough.