[mlir][Pass] Add support for generating local crash reproducers

[rriddle]

Summary

This revision adds a mode to the crash reproducer generator to attempt to generate a more local reproducer. This will attempt to generate a reproducer right before the offending pass that fails. This is useful for the majority of failures that are specific to a single pass, and situations where some passes in the pipeline are not registered with a specific tool.

Depends On D78313

[jpienaar]

mlir/docs/PassManagement.md

1001

minimal has to me a size connotation (e.g., "minimum amount of code needed to make the bug appear when executed."), and here it is more about scope than size (e.g., you only need to run one pass, but your reproducer may be huge). Would "local" or "pass-pipeline-dump-before-first-fail" work? Alternatively, where do you see someone not wanting this behavior?

1004

Missing space before (

[rriddle]

mlir/docs/PassManagement.md

1001

I'm fine with local.

This type of behavior isn't desirable if there are multi-pass interactions. It isn't guaranteed that the problem is with the pass that it is failing.

[rriddle]

Resolve comments

[mehdi_amini]

mlir/docs/PassManagement.md

1001

Interestingly local was confusing to me since I thought of it as opposite to "remote" ;)

[rriddle]

Rebase