We had a precompiled binary committed and not all of the relocations
supported were tested. This patch fixes this.
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D67615
Paths
| Differential D67617
[llvm-readobj] - Test PPC64 relocations properly. ClosedPublic Authored by grimar on Sep 16 2019, 6:40 AM.
Details Summary We had a precompiled binary committed and not all of the relocations Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D67615
Diff Detail
Event TimelineHerald added subscribers: seiya, rupprecht, kbarton, nemanjai. · View Herald TranscriptSep 16 2019, 6:40 AM Comment Actions Looks good, though, as a belated thought after D62594, I wonder if we really want to test every enum member listed in BinaryFormat/ELFRelocs/*.def. The source code just uses the X macros pattern to support every enum member, but we test every possibility. Comment Actions
I think it is good to test everything because of the following reasons.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 17 2019, 2:11 AM Closed by commit rL372110: [llvm-readobj] - Test PPC64 relocations properly. (authored by grimar). · Explain WhySep 17 2019, 5:04 AM This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Revision Contents
Diff 220480 llvm/trunk/test/tools/llvm-readobj/reloc-types-elf-ppc64.test
|