For example:
void foo(int a); foo(-2);
should be fixed as:
foo(/*a=*/-2);
This change tries to fix this issue.
|  Differential  D67084  
[clang-tidy] Fix bugprone-argument-comment bug: negative literal number is not checked. Authored by xyb on Sep 2 2019, 12:20 PM. 
Details 
 For example: void foo(int a); foo(-2); should be fixed as: foo(/*a=*/-2); This change tries to fix this issue. 
Diff Detail Event Timeline
 
 Comment Actions Please add full context to the diff. See https://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#requesting-a-review-via-the-web-interface Comment Actions LGTM! 
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The bug claims that this is only for handling negative literals, but this allows any unary operator. Is that intentional? If we're going to allow arbitrary unary operators, why not arbitrary binary operators as well?