It is now possible after D61937 was landed and was discussed
in it's review comments. It is not consistent with GNU, which
does not output .dynamic section content in this case for
no visible reason.
Should it be only done for LLVM style output, i.e. for llvm-readobj,
but not for GNU (llvm-readelf)?
might want -> will
the dynamic section found -> the found dynamic section
I don't think you need the last sentence.