Added an assertion to constant evaluation enty points that prohibits dependent expressions

[gribozavr]

Summary

Constant evaluator does not work on value-dependent or type-dependent
expressions.

Also fixed bugs uncovered by these assertions.

[Rakete1111]

Can you add tests for the bugs you fixed? thanks

[ABataev]

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp

5784

I would suggest to modify the code of this function if we cannot get the value of the loops.

if (CollapseLoopCountExpr->isValueDependent() || CollapseLoopCountExpr->isTypeDependent() || OrderedLoopCountExpr->isValueDependent() || OrderedLoopCountExpr->isTypeDependent()) {
  Built.clear(/* size */0);
  return 1;
}

at the beginning of the function.

[gribozavr]

Can you add tests for the bugs you fixed? thanks

The bugs were detected by existing tests (those tests triggered the newly added assertions).

[gribozavr]

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp

5784

I tried doing that, and a lot of tests started crashing with:

llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:9024: clang::StmtResult clang::Sema::ActOnOpenMPTargetTeamsDistributeSimdDirective(ArrayRef<clang::OMPClause *>, clang::Stmt *, clang::SourceLoc
ation, clang::SourceLocation, clang::Sema::VarsWithInheritedDSAType &): Assertion `(CurContext->isDependentContext() || B.builtAll()) && "omp target teams distribute simd loop exprs were not built"' failed.

Also, I wanted to note that if I were to make this change, then if EvaluateAsInt fails, we should apply the same recovery (Built.clear(); return).

[ABataev]

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp

5784

The just try to use Built.clear(/* size */1);, I assume it must fix the problems.

[rsmith]

The right thing to check in all of these cases should be only isValueDependent(). Every type-dependent expression should generally also be value-dependent (because the type is part of the value), but value-dependent exactly means "dependent in a way that prevents constant evaluation", so that's all that we should be checking.

[gribozavr]

Addressed review comments:

• Simplified error handling in SemaOpenMP,

• Only check isValueDependent.

[gribozavr]

In D61522#1494155, @rsmith wrote:

The right thing to check in all of these cases should be only isValueDependent(). Every type-dependent expression should generally also be value-dependent (because the type is part of the value), but value-dependent exactly means "dependent in a way that prevents constant evaluation", so that's all that we should be checking.

Done. PTAL.

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp

5784

Yes, this works! Thanks!

[rsmith]

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp

6369–6371

This is treating value-dependent enable_if conditions as having failed. Is that really appropriate? (When do we call this with value-depnedent enable_if attributes? I'd expect it to only be called after substitution)

[gribozavr]

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp

6369–6371

This test case in llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/enable_if.cpp passes a dependent condition:

void h(int);
template <typename T> void outer() {
  void local_function() __attribute__((enable_if(::h(T()), "")));
  local_function();
};

According to https://reviews.llvm.org/D20130, it seems like it was decided to document implementation details as specification, and say that enable_if is evaluated during overload resolution, whenever that happens to happen.

[gribozavr]

@ABataev @rsmith Ping.

[rsmith]

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp

6369–6371

Hm. Yeah, I suppose we disable enable_if functions if the condition can't be evaluated, and this is a "can't be evaluated" case in some sense. I don't like it (the right thing would be to treat this as a dependent overload resolution), but as a short-term fix for this patch I suppose it's the right local choice.

[ABataev]

LG

clang/lib/AST/Expr.cpp

for (unsigned I = 0; I < Exprs.size(); ++I)
     if (Exprs[I]->isTypeDependent())
       return true;
 
   return false;
 }
 
 bool Expr::isConstantInitializer(ASTContext &Ctx, bool IsForRef,
                                  const Expr **Culprit) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   // This function is attempting whether an expression is an initializer
   // which can be evaluated at compile-time. It very closely parallels
   // ConstExprEmitter in CGExprConstant.cpp; if they don't match, it
   // will lead to unexpected results.  Like ConstExprEmitter, it falls back
   // to isEvaluatable most of the time.
   //
   // If we ever capture reference-binding directly in the AST, we can
   // kill the second parameter.

clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp

 
 /// EvaluateAsRValue - Return true if this is a constant which we can fold using
 /// any crazy technique (that has nothing to do with language standards) that
 /// we want to.  If this function returns true, it returns the folded constant
 /// in Result. If this expression is a glvalue, an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion
 /// will be applied to the result.
 bool Expr::EvaluateAsRValue(EvalResult &Result, const ASTContext &Ctx,
                             bool InConstantContext) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, Result, EvalInfo::EM_IgnoreSideEffects);
   Info.InConstantContext = InConstantContext;
   return ::EvaluateAsRValue(this, Result, Ctx, Info);
 }
 
 bool Expr::EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(bool &Result,
                                       const ASTContext &Ctx) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
   EvalResult Scratch;
   return EvaluateAsRValue(Scratch, Ctx) &&
          HandleConversionToBool(Scratch.Val, Result);
 }
 
 bool Expr::EvaluateAsInt(EvalResult &Result, const ASTContext &Ctx,
                          SideEffectsKind AllowSideEffects) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, Result, EvalInfo::EM_IgnoreSideEffects);
   return ::EvaluateAsInt(this, Result, Ctx, AllowSideEffects, Info);
 }
 
 bool Expr::EvaluateAsFixedPoint(EvalResult &Result, const ASTContext &Ctx,
                                 SideEffectsKind AllowSideEffects) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, Result, EvalInfo::EM_IgnoreSideEffects);
   return ::EvaluateAsFixedPoint(this, Result, Ctx, AllowSideEffects, Info);
 }
 
 bool Expr::EvaluateAsFloat(APFloat &Result, const ASTContext &Ctx,
                            SideEffectsKind AllowSideEffects) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   if (!getType()->isRealFloatingType())
     return false;
 
   EvalResult ExprResult;
   if (!EvaluateAsRValue(ExprResult, Ctx) || !ExprResult.Val.isFloat() ||
       hasUnacceptableSideEffect(ExprResult, AllowSideEffects))
     return false;
 
   Result = ExprResult.Val.getFloat();
   return true;
 }
 
 bool Expr::EvaluateAsLValue(EvalResult &Result, const ASTContext &Ctx) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, Result, EvalInfo::EM_ConstantFold);
 
   LValue LV;
   if (!EvaluateLValue(this, LV, Info) || Result.HasSideEffects ||
       !CheckLValueConstantExpression(Info, getExprLoc(),
                                      Ctx.getLValueReferenceType(getType()), LV,
                                      Expr::EvaluateForCodeGen))
     return false;
 
   LV.moveInto(Result.Val);
   return true;
 }
 
 bool Expr::EvaluateAsConstantExpr(EvalResult &Result, ConstExprUsage Usage,
                                   const ASTContext &Ctx) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   EvalInfo::EvaluationMode EM = EvalInfo::EM_ConstantExpression;
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, Result, EM);
   Info.InConstantContext = true;
 
   if (!::Evaluate(Result.Val, Info, this))
     return false;
 
   return CheckConstantExpression(Info, getExprLoc(), getType(), Result.Val,
                                  Usage);
 }
 
 bool Expr::EvaluateAsInitializer(APValue &Value, const ASTContext &Ctx,
                                  const VarDecl *VD,
                             SmallVectorImpl<PartialDiagnosticAt> &Notes) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   // FIXME: Evaluating initializers for large array and record types can cause
   // performance problems. Only do so in C++11 for now.
   if (isRValue() && (getType()->isArrayType() || getType()->isRecordType()) &&
       !Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11)
     return false;
 
   Expr::EvalStatus EStatus;
   EStatus.Diag = &Notes;
bool Expr::EvaluateAsInitializer(APValue &Value, const ASTContext &Ctx,
 
   return CheckConstantExpression(InitInfo, VD->getLocation(), VD->getType(),
                                  Value);
 }
 
 /// isEvaluatable - Call EvaluateAsRValue to see if this expression can be
 /// constant folded, but discard the result.
 bool Expr::isEvaluatable(const ASTContext &Ctx, SideEffectsKind SEK) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   EvalResult Result;
   return EvaluateAsRValue(Result, Ctx, /* in constant context */ true) &&
          !hasUnacceptableSideEffect(Result, SEK);
 }
 
 APSInt Expr::EvaluateKnownConstInt(const ASTContext &Ctx,
                     SmallVectorImpl<PartialDiagnosticAt> *Diag) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   EvalResult EVResult;
   EVResult.Diag = Diag;
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, EVResult, EvalInfo::EM_IgnoreSideEffects);
   Info.InConstantContext = true;
 
   bool Result = ::EvaluateAsRValue(this, EVResult, Ctx, Info);
   (void)Result;
   assert(Result && "Could not evaluate expression");
   assert(EVResult.Val.isInt() && "Expression did not evaluate to integer");
 
   return EVResult.Val.getInt();
 }
 
 APSInt Expr::EvaluateKnownConstIntCheckOverflow(
     const ASTContext &Ctx, SmallVectorImpl<PartialDiagnosticAt> *Diag) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   EvalResult EVResult;
   EVResult.Diag = Diag;
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, EVResult, EvalInfo::EM_EvaluateForOverflow);
   Info.InConstantContext = true;
 
   bool Result = ::EvaluateAsRValue(Info, this, EVResult.Val);
   (void)Result;
   assert(Result && "Could not evaluate expression");
   assert(EVResult.Val.isInt() && "Expression did not evaluate to integer");
 
   return EVResult.Val.getInt();
 }
 
 void Expr::EvaluateForOverflow(const ASTContext &Ctx) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   bool IsConst;
   EvalResult EVResult;
   if (!FastEvaluateAsRValue(this, EVResult, Ctx, IsConst)) {
     EvalInfo Info(Ctx, EVResult, EvalInfo::EM_EvaluateForOverflow);
     (void)::EvaluateAsRValue(Info, this, EVResult.Val);
   }
 }
 
static bool EvaluateCPlusPlus11IntegralConstantExpr(const ASTContext &Ctx,
   }
 
   if (Value) *Value = Result.getInt();
   return true;
 }
 
 bool Expr::isIntegerConstantExpr(const ASTContext &Ctx,
                                  SourceLocation *Loc) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   if (Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11)
     return EvaluateCPlusPlus11IntegralConstantExpr(Ctx, this, nullptr, Loc);
 
   ICEDiag D = CheckICE(this, Ctx);
   if (D.Kind != IK_ICE) {
     if (Loc) *Loc = D.Loc;
     return false;
   }
   return true;
 }
 
 bool Expr::isIntegerConstantExpr(llvm::APSInt &Value, const ASTContext &Ctx,
                                  SourceLocation *Loc, bool isEvaluated) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   if (Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11)
     return EvaluateCPlusPlus11IntegralConstantExpr(Ctx, this, &Value, Loc);
 
   if (!isIntegerConstantExpr(Ctx, Loc))
     return false;
 
   // The only possible side-effects here are due to UB discovered in the
   // evaluation (for instance, INT_MAX + 1). In such a case, we are still
   // required to treat the expression as an ICE, so we produce the folded
   // value.
   EvalResult ExprResult;
   Expr::EvalStatus Status;
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, Status, EvalInfo::EM_IgnoreSideEffects);
   Info.InConstantContext = true;
 
   if (!::EvaluateAsInt(this, ExprResult, Ctx, SE_AllowSideEffects, Info))
     llvm_unreachable("ICE cannot be evaluated!");
 
   Value = ExprResult.Val.getInt();
   return true;
 }
 
 bool Expr::isCXX98IntegralConstantExpr(const ASTContext &Ctx) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   return CheckICE(this, Ctx).Kind == IK_ICE;
 }
 
 bool Expr::isCXX11ConstantExpr(const ASTContext &Ctx, APValue *Result,
                                SourceLocation *Loc) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   // We support this checking in C++98 mode in order to diagnose compatibility
   // issues.
   assert(Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus);
 
   // Build evaluation settings.
   Expr::EvalStatus Status;
   SmallVector<PartialDiagnosticAt, 8> Diags;
   Status.Diag = &Diags;
bool Expr::isCXX11ConstantExpr(const ASTContext &Ctx, APValue *Result,
 
   return IsConstExpr;
 }
 
 bool Expr::EvaluateWithSubstitution(APValue &Value, ASTContext &Ctx,
                                     const FunctionDecl *Callee,
                                     ArrayRef<const Expr*> Args,
                                     const Expr *This) const {
+  assert(!isValueDependent() && !isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   Expr::EvalStatus Status;
   EvalInfo Info(Ctx, Status, EvalInfo::EM_ConstantExpressionUnevaluated);
   Info.InConstantContext = true;
 
   LValue ThisVal;
   const LValue *ThisPtr = nullptr;
   if (This) {
 #ifndef NDEBUG
     auto *MD = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(Callee);
     assert(MD && "Don't provide `this` for non-methods.");
     assert(!MD->isStatic() && "Don't provide `this` for static methods.");
 #endif
     if (EvaluateObjectArgument(Info, This, ThisVal))
       ThisPtr = &ThisVal;
     if (Info.EvalStatus.HasSideEffects)
       return false;
   }
 
   ArgVector ArgValues(Args.size());
   for (ArrayRef<const Expr*>::iterator I = Args.begin(), E = Args.end();
        I != E; ++I) {
-    if ((*I)->isValueDependent() ||
+    if ((*I)->isValueDependent() || (*I)->isTypeDependent() ||
         !Evaluate(ArgValues[I - Args.begin()], Info, *I))
       // If evaluation fails, throw away the argument entirely.
       ArgValues[I - Args.begin()] = APValue();
     if (Info.EvalStatus.HasSideEffects)
       return false;
   }
 
   // Build fake call to Callee.
bool Expr::isPotentialConstantExpr(const FunctionDecl *FD,
 
   return Diags.empty();
 }
 
 bool Expr::isPotentialConstantExprUnevaluated(Expr *E,
                                               const FunctionDecl *FD,
                                               SmallVectorImpl<
                                                 PartialDiagnosticAt> &Diags) {
+  assert(!E->isValueDependent() && !E->isTypeDependent() &&
+         "Expression evaluator can't be called on a dependent expression.");
+
   Expr::EvalStatus Status;
   Status.Diag = &Diags;
 
   EvalInfo Info(FD->getASTContext(), Status,
                 EvalInfo::EM_PotentialConstantExpressionUnevaluated);
   Info.InConstantContext = true;
 
   // Fabricate a call stack frame to give the arguments a plausible cover story.

clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp

void Sema::CheckUnsequencedOperations(Expr *E) {
   }
 }
 
 void Sema::CheckCompletedExpr(Expr *E, SourceLocation CheckLoc,
                               bool IsConstexpr) {
   CheckImplicitConversions(E, CheckLoc);
   if (!E->isInstantiationDependent())
     CheckUnsequencedOperations(E);
-  if (!IsConstexpr && !E->isValueDependent())
+  if (!IsConstexpr && !E->isValueDependent() && !E->isTypeDependent())
     CheckForIntOverflow(E);
   DiagnoseMisalignedMembers();
 }
 
 void Sema::CheckBitFieldInitialization(SourceLocation InitLoc,
                                        FieldDecl *BitField,
                                        Expr *Init) {
   (void) AnalyzeBitFieldAssignment(*this, BitField, Init, InitLoc);

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp

checkOpenMPLoop(OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind, Expr *CollapseLoopCountExpr,
                 Expr *OrderedLoopCountExpr, Stmt *AStmt, Sema &SemaRef,
                 DSAStackTy &DSA,
                 Sema::VarsWithInheritedDSAType &VarsWithImplicitDSA,
                 OMPLoopDirective::HelperExprs &Built) {
   unsigned NestedLoopCount = 1;
   if (CollapseLoopCountExpr) {
     // Found 'collapse' clause - calculate collapse number.
     Expr::EvalResult Result;
-    if (CollapseLoopCountExpr->EvaluateAsInt(Result, SemaRef.getASTContext()))
+    if (!CollapseLoopCountExpr->isValueDependent() &&
+        !CollapseLoopCountExpr->isTypeDependent() &&
+        CollapseLoopCountExpr->EvaluateAsInt(Result, SemaRef.getASTContext()))
       NestedLoopCount = Result.Val.getInt().getLimitedValue();
   }
   unsigned OrderedLoopCount = 1;
   if (OrderedLoopCountExpr) {
     // Found 'ordered' clause - calculate collapse number.
     Expr::EvalResult EVResult;
-    if (OrderedLoopCountExpr->EvaluateAsInt(EVResult, SemaRef.getASTContext())) {
+    if (!OrderedLoopCountExpr->isValueDependent() &&
+        !OrderedLoopCountExpr->isTypeDependent() &&
+        OrderedLoopCountExpr->EvaluateAsInt(EVResult,
+                                            SemaRef.getASTContext())) {
       llvm::APSInt Result = EVResult.Val.getInt();
       if (Result.getLimitedValue() < NestedLoopCount) {
         SemaRef.Diag(OrderedLoopCountExpr->getExprLoc(),
                      diag::err_omp_wrong_ordered_loop_count)
             << OrderedLoopCountExpr->getSourceRange();
         SemaRef.Diag(CollapseLoopCountExpr->getExprLoc(),
                      diag::note_collapse_loop_count)
             << CollapseLoopCountExpr->getSourceRange();

clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp

if (!convertArgsForAvailabilityChecks(
           *this, Function, /*ThisArg=*/nullptr, Args, Trap,
           /*MissingImplicitThis=*/true, DiscardedThis, ConvertedArgs))
     return *EnableIfAttrs.begin();
 
   for (auto *EIA : EnableIfAttrs) {
     APValue Result;
     // FIXME: This doesn't consider value-dependent cases, because doing so is
     // very difficult. Ideally, we should handle them more gracefully.
-    if (!EIA->getCond()->EvaluateWithSubstitution(
+    if (EIA->getCond()->isValueDependent() ||
+        EIA->getCond()->isTypeDependent() ||
+        !EIA->getCond()->EvaluateWithSubstitution(
             Result, Context, Function, llvm::makeArrayRef(ConvertedArgs)))
       return EIA;
 
     if (!Result.isInt() || !Result.getInt().getBoolValue())
       return EIA;
   }
   return nullptr;
 }

 }
 
 } // end anonymous namespace
 
 static bool isFunctionAlwaysEnabled(const ASTContext &Ctx,
                                     const FunctionDecl *FD) {
   for (auto *EnableIf : FD->specific_attrs<EnableIfAttr>()) {
     bool AlwaysTrue;
-    if (!EnableIf->getCond()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(AlwaysTrue, Ctx))
+    if (EnableIf->getCond()->isValueDependent() ||
+        EnableIf->getCond()->isTypeDependent() ||
+        !EnableIf->getCond()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(AlwaysTrue, Ctx))
       return false;
     if (!AlwaysTrue)
       return false;
   }
   return true;
 }
 
 /// Returns true if we can take the address of the function.