Alternative to approach suggested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60537#1473987.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
- Build Status
Buildable 31196 Build 31195: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Louis,
thanks for the alternative proposal.
A couple of question:
- What's motivation to change "stdlib" to "extra"? To avoid some confusing? (because "stdlib" is not a part of the standard library here)
- Can we keep "pstl" name (instead of proposed "include")? The fact is many people have already use PSTL code (as "third party" headers) and a usage model is following:
#include "pstl/execution"
#include "pstl/algorithm"
#include "pstl/numeric"
#include "pstl/memory"
We would not like to force them changing #include "pstl/execution" to #include "include/execution"
Comment Actions
...
I don't mind. All I care is that this stuff stays out of the main include directory.
So, will you update the patch?
pstl/extra/include -> pstl/stdlib/pstl