Currently, we emit DW_AT_addr_base that points to the beginning of
the .debug_addr section. That is not correct for the DWARF5 case because address
table contains the header and the attribute should point to the first entry
following the header.
This is currently the reason why LLDB does not work with such executables correctly.
Is there any reason to support not labeling the address pool? It doesn't look like this should be conditional.