I'm not too sure that this aligns with the very short descriptions of other checkers, but I don't see how I could squeeze it down more without losing readability.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
george.karpenkov NoQ rnkovacs xazax.hun - Commits
- rG2e4067226bd2: [analyzer][UninitializedObjectChecker] Added documentation to the checker list
rC340266: [analyzer][UninitializedObjectChecker] Added documentation to the checker list
rL340266: [analyzer][UninitializedObjectChecker] Added documentation to the checker list
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html | ||
---|---|---|
334–336 | This statement has been debated for a while, so I'm all for discussing it, as I feel I've gained a lot more knowledge about this subject since it was last mentioned. |
www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html | ||
---|---|---|
334–336 | The documentation should still reflect the actual state of things, right? |
www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html | ||
---|---|---|
334–336 | Yes :) |
This statement has been debated for a while, so I'm all for discussing it, as I feel I've gained a lot more knowledge about this subject since it was last mentioned.