https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37312
rdar://40270582
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Am i understanding correctly that the whole point is that you don't need function to pointer decay when there's already a function pointer?
Sounds reasonable.
Comment Actions
that you don't need function to pointer decay when there's already a function pointer?
Yes. Weird though that we haven't seen this case before, I'm still not entirely sure why.