LLDB currently defines dw_form_t as a uint16_t which makes sense.
However, LLVM also defines a similar type llvm::dwarf::Form which is
an enum backed by a uint16_t. Switching to the llvm implementation
means that we can more easily interoperate with the LLVM DWARF code.
Additionally, we get some type checking out of this: I found that
DWARFAttribute had a method called FormAtIndex that returned a
dw_attr_t. Although dw_attr_t is also a uint16_t under the hood,
the type checking benefits here are undeniable: If this had returned a
something of different signedness/width, we could have had some bad
bugs.